03 Sep '08 18:42>
Impressive game - I couldn't even evaluate it. 😉
Originally posted by wormwoodcarslsen sacrificed a pawn in the early middlegame, but after a long variation ended up in the defending side of a drawish endgame, and I thought it would be draw soon but the kid keeps giving pawns even in the endgame:
topalov vs. carlsen in a minute, should be exciting!
Originally posted by NordlysYes. I think Anand's preparation was probably faulty and he was just one tempo too late in the position:
Topalov beat Anand in 25 moves today! 😲
Originally posted by AlboMalapropFoozerI don't think that would be fair, and it seems it would encourage the black side even more for simply trying to draw as soon as possible, which is already what's going on.
Of the numerous suggestions that I've seen to reduce the number of draws in tournaments, the one that made the most sense and seemed the fairest was to award White 0.4 and Black 0.6 tournament points when a draw occurs.
Originally posted by diskamylThe effect of the reduced incentive for White to draw would outweigh the effect of the increased incentive for Black to draw. The percentage of short draws would be significantly reduced and the overall percentage of draws would be moderately reduced. Furthermore, it would be completely fair for the typical all GM RR tournament where each player plays the same number of games with each color.
I don't think that would be fair, and it seems it would encourage the black side even more for simply trying to draw as soon as possible, which is already what's going on.
Originally posted by AlboMalapropFoozerhmm..
The effect of the reduced incentive for White to draw would outweigh the effect of the increased incentive for Black to draw. The percentage of short draws would be significantly reduced and the overall percentage of draws would be moderately reduced. Furthermore, it would be completely fair for the typical all GM RR tournament where each player plays the same number of games with each color.