CA9 v Chessbase

Just wondering players thoughts on the above products (Chess Assistant 9 and Chessbase 9)? If you had the choice which would you want to get or would you want both?

I'm just wondering if the functions are different enough to warrant both. I already have Chessbase 9 and it is quite smart (if a little buggy).

For those who already have CA9, what is the commented game service like? At the moment I get the chessbase magazines + TWIC pgns. But the idea of having an auto-updated system very much appeals to me. Just wondering about the quality of the commentary. The other things that appeal to me are the listing of the actual opening name on the printouts (instead of just the ECO code).

Any and all constructive thoughts are welcome.

Originally posted by JDK2
Just wondering players thoughts on the above products (Chess Assistant 9 and Chessbase 9)? If you had the choice which would you want to get or would you want both?

I'm just wondering if the functions are different enough to warrant both. I already have Chessbase 9 and it is quite smart (if a little buggy).

For those who already have CA9, what is the co ...[text shortened]... the printouts (instead of just the ECO code).

Any and all constructive thoughts are welcome.