27 Jul '09 07:13>
Is it because they cannot hack the competition over at FICS?
Opinions please.
Opinions please.
Originally posted by Squelchbelchi never knew the mythical centaur played chess in his labyrinth. why does he not like it at Fics? is there some sort of mechanism for instantly detecting his bad habits and kicking him out?
Is it because they cannot hack the competition over at FICS?
Opinions please.
Originally posted by Squelchbelchwhat do you think of the idea of allowing this on RHP? a specific platform for those who want to play this variant? does it not have merit?
FICS freely allows centaurs (strong chess players that also use engines to suggest moves) so there are some very strong ones there.
On RHP a centaur will only play other engine users part of the time because RHP bans all engine users, especially those with high ratings & few losses or draws against other blatant engine users.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn principle I would not be morally against a centaur area under certain circumstances:
what do you think of the idea of allowing this on RHP? a specific platform for those who want to play this variant? does it not have merit?
Originally posted by SquelchbelchI think it's because it wouldn't give the same emotional satisfaction of pretending to be legitimately strong human player. having the computer tag in their name sort of gives the engine the credit for any possible brilliancy. here they can act out the fantasy of being a real strong player, even a master.
Is it because they cannot hack the competition over at FICS?
Opinions please.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI actually think this would be a good idea. Not necessarily having a user permanently branded with the (C) suffix, but having one or two unrated tournaments where engine assistance is allowed might be interesting ..
what do you think of the idea of allowing this on RHP? a specific platform for those who want to play this variant? does it not have merit?
Originally posted by SchumiThanks for your reply. Do you (or anybody else here) know if the accounts claiming to be normal persons are allowed to use computer assistance?
There are accounts marked as computers. I don't know if they're all automated or if some have a person involved too.
Originally posted by GuychNo assistance would be allowed for human accounts. That would include books and databases too, unlike here.
Thanks for your reply. Do you (or anybody else here) know if the accounts claiming to be normal persons are allowed to use computer assistance?
Thanks!