Originally posted by zozozozo
thats how i play too! why am i not as good as you then?😛
I am not good; I just do the same training again and again again till perfection -which it never seems to come!
I just follow the opening theory of a specific strategy that I understand in full, so after all those years I know by means of trial and error analyses when I have to quit it.
You as well can do it easily once you establish your own repertoire. For example, my White 1.d4 repertoire is consisted of folders regarding each of the 19 basic defensive systems of the Black, and game after game each folder becomes even more sophisticated and deep. I know very well what exactly I have to expect from the Black after my 1.d4, for this is a well known path of mine.
And my Scheveningen datas are so well worked out that now I have established quite deep lines after the basic 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 d6 for the following continuations:
6.Be2
6.f4 Nc6
6.Be3 Nc6
6.Be3 a6
6.Bc4
6.g3
6.g4
and the differ ...f3 variations, whilst I have strong back up regarding Wing Gambit, Smith-Morra, Grand Prix, Closed and 2.c3.
Every single game I have ever played with the Black since 1988 after 1.c5 is Scheveningen, and against 1.d4 is KID. And every single game I played since that year with the White is 1.d4!
I hope you comprehend😵