04 Oct '08 15:08>
Originally posted by MrHandAre you genuinely this clueless? Or are also engaging in one of those "theatrical presentations" you were referring to?
Ok, pro-wrestling is a sport because they need to compete with their theatrical presentation of themselves so they can attract viewers and then get the good scripts from the bosses. I believe that summarizes the argument that you are proposing for the case of pro-wrestling as sport.
I interpret that to be an argument that competition is purely for a bus ...[text shortened]... scribe has nothing to do with winning a wrestling match on the merits of their physical ability.
Re-read my post a few times (or get someone with reading comprehension beyond the level of an elementary school student to read it to you).
1) I never proposed that pro-wrestling was a sport. Saying "you could make an argument" is not the same thing as proposing it as a sport. I was just giving some leeway to a previous poster's suggestion.
2) You can interpret what I said any way you choose. Your subjective interpretation has no objective validity whatsoever.
"The competition you describe has nothing to do with winning a wrestling match on the merits of their physical ability."
What exactly is your point? You're making a statement, but no point. You seem to be harking back to the earlier suggestion that a sport isn't a sport unless there is some degree of physical athleticism, which I do NOT agree with.
And FYI, ALL SPORTS are about the BUSINESS of entertaining fans and promotion. You're probably not a boxing fan, lol, but if you were you'd know that many famous boxers, such as Roy Jones jr, etc, would engage in all sorts of antics in the ring, even at the cost of risking the fight, in order to be more entertaining.