nope. I've been offered them many times though, but my answer is always the same: thanks for asking, but I'm still improving steadily on my own, so there doesn't seem to be any reason to pay anyone money for it.
sometimes they even come back to ask if I've changed my mind. I'm sort of beginning to think that'll never happen.
I took about 4 or 5 lessons from the top player at our club a few years ago. I'm not sure I could pinpoint exactly what I learned, but in no particular order, the things I remember from the lessons were:
- Play forcing moves. I remember he kept saying 'You must attack' all the time.
- Opening repertoire. I had no idea what openings to play as black before, and now I have a reasonable idea.
- K + N + B vs K endgame drills. Very difficult at first, got easier eventually.
Probably a few other bits and pieces as well, but the main point was that it was fun! Reading chess books is all very well, but it can be a little dry. On the other hand, someone passionately waving their arms around and getting excited about the game brought it to life a little.
I'd say that if you can afford a few trial lessons, have a go and see how you get on .. 🙂
Originally posted by JayDohertyThat's the real question. Books are excellent at introducing and expanding on ideas using specific games, and there is much to be learned from books that simply wouldn't be practical to learn (and probably not as accurately explained) during a weekly lesson, such as in-depth opening theory or advanced endgames. However, a live teacher can play against you, evaluate your play and remind you of the themes/strategies/tactics that you should be employing when you make your mistakes. The immediate feedback tailored to your specific weaknesses could be invaluable, provided you have the right teacher.
It would be interesting to know what chess lessons would comprise of. I would imagine that getting a better memory would be the best thing to help you, or to be more precise me..
Wouldn't a decent book be just as good?
Just wondering if anyone has taken a lesson and come out feeling ripped-off for just this reason, or if they found the experience to be enjoyable and rewarding - and if you did, who was your teacher?!? 🙂
Originally posted by aquatabbyGood advice. Thanks!
I took about 4 or 5 lessons from the top player at our club a few years ago. I'm not sure I could pinpoint exactly what I learned, but in no particular order, the things I remember from the lessons were:
- Play forcing moves. I remember he kept saying 'You must attack' all the time.
- Opening repertoire. I had no idea what openings to play as black bef ...[text shortened]...
I'd say that if you can afford a few trial lessons, have a go and see how you get on .. 🙂
A couple of years ago I signed up to www.improveyourchess.com - a chess site run by GM Tony Kosten. They have a training/coaching system set up. I paid for 3 sessions at about £30 each. Then I emailed three (preferably OTB) games to my coach each month in a Fritz format. I got the games back with the coaches analysis and could also enter into some email correspondence off the back of it.
The coach was IM Richard Palliser and it was superb - concise but packed with useful insights and suggestions for further learning. As with all these things it does depend on getting the right coach at the right time and in a way that's right for you. Good coaching can accelerate learning (IMHO).
When I thought about the cost of the coaching and the time the coach must have committed and the level of the coach I thought it was good value too.
Originally posted by PBE6I took some lessons from Elena Donaldson (FIDE 2530) about 6 years ago. Pretty helpful, but I was an Over The Board player then. Since I switched to correspondence only events, I don't think it's necessary since the study and compitition are now in one operation. 😏
Just wondering if anyone here has taken chess lessons. I'm thinking about it, and I'm curious as to other people's experiences (of course, the quality of the teacher will have a lot to do with the experience...).