Originally posted by greenpawn34Yes 29. Rh4 Qg7 0-1. But 29. Kd2 Qg7 is quite 0-1 too, 🙂)
29,Rh4 Qg7 (now forced) 30.Qg5 Nf4. It's over.
Wanted to show the instructive double purpose behind 29.Kd2.
But right perhaps should shown 29.Rh4,
Never mind looking for holes in my analysis.
Get out there and get me a pub sign.
And indeed that's some nice looking pub sign in the end of the article - although its name is Chequers Inn?! - but I would not know of any of such artistry in my area...
Originally posted by heinzkat
Yes 29. Rh4 Qg7 0-1. But 29. Kd2 Qg7 is quite 0-1 too, 🙂)
And indeed that's some nice looking pub sign in the end of the article, but I would not know of any of such artistry in my area...
I mention that he should now kill the game with Qg7.
But by playing 29.Kd2 he has given Black another choice
the swindle is to get his mind off Qg7.
Black dived in perhaps seeing a mate that was not there and
certainly missing the mates that were there.
Also I bet he planned to pick up that h1 Rook till he saw the mess
he was in.
A lot of Street Fighter in there - giving your opponnet
new problems where before there was none. (a good book that).
Edit1:
What do you mean you don't know of any of such artistry in your area.
There isi bound to be - how do you know untill you have looked.
If you post again within the 4 hours I'll know you have not been out
looking for chess signs outside pubs.