Originally posted by Schlecter
Garry Kasparov notice this similarities and equivalences of chess and life:
"How Life Imitates Chess ". A very nice book.
(That book shows how far was Kasparov from the previous Champions..... they were just chess players, the have the chess and nothing more in life, remember Fischer?)
A PhD has to be like a GM ....
Even better a Chess Champion is like God
I actually have that book, it is an interesting read, but it more depicts people's attitude and the way the mind works for both general day-to-day situations and chess, comparing the two... it doesn't discuss the equivalences like how you are saying.
Sure, there are similarities.
To become a GM at chess takes a lot of hard work, dedication and memory (and money!)
The same goes for gaining a PhD.
But to simply stop there and say that one is the direct equivalent of another just falls flat to me.
Chess is about the struggle against opposition, to learn from previous mistakes and to overcome obstacles in defeating rivals... it is these games that make your rating go up, and put you closer to achieving your goal.
Also in chess, your studies and preparation alone might still not be good enough to defeat certain opponents, as they may have prepared better, or simply be more naturally talented at the game.
When it comes to PhD's, or any other level of academic study for that matter,
the only person you are ever trying to better is
yourself.
You do not sit in an exam hall trying to
beat other people (if you are then you're studying for the wrong reasons).
And with a little hard work and dedication, anyone - and I mean
anyone - can get a PhD, if they want it enough.
This is not the case for Grandmasters.
So please stop saying they are "equivalents", you're giving people headaches.