17 Jul 14
1 edit
Originally posted by lemondropexample: 10 member challenge won by score of 20-0, winner gets 20 points and loser gets 0 points
why does the winner take all and the loser get nothing?
doesn't seem fair
in another 10 member challenge won by score of 10-9.5, winner still gets 20 points and the loser still 0
where is the fairness, the logic?
This allows for too many lopsided scores thus inflating some clans positions on the clan ladders especially those clans loaded with sandbaggers and unscrupulous clan leaders
It's not to late to change, to remedy this situation would be a start
17 Jul 14
Originally posted by lemondropIt does not matter what scoring system is used, the sandbaggers and unscrupulous will exploit it. That is what they do.
example: 10 member challenge won by score of 20-0, winner gets 20 points and loser gets 0 points
in another 10 member challenge won by score of 10-9.5, winner still gets 20 points and the loser still 0
where is the fairness, the logic?
This allows for too many lopsided scores thus inflating some clans positions on the clan ladders especially those ...[text shortened]... scrupulous clan leaders
It's not to late to change, to remedy this situation would be a start
17 Jul 14
2 edits
Originally posted by Ponderablecould you give an example.
The net points are counted and the net points is the default metrics for the table displayed.
I my example of the clan that wins a 10 member match by only 1 point gets the same amount of points as if they won by 20, the nine points the loser scores has no bearing on the net score. The only time the losing clan gets any net points is when there is a draw.
All I am saying is why the are the net points and gross points the same for the winner? It is the net points that determine the ladder rankings not the gross
