Only Chess
06 Mar 08
06 Mar 08
This is not a cheating allegation. This is simply a statement of facts.
As posted on his website (http://www.clausjensen.com/), cludi has decided to leave in light of recent events.
I for one regret being sucked into the witch-hunt without knowing all of the details. Recently, a reply by a site administrator was posted (and deleted) which specifically explained that the said accused player was in fact not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But at this point, I would definitely consider doing the same as cludi.
Best of luck. Please continue to update your blog.
-Witty
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by wittywonkaI can (want to post) it again, but I'm afraid it will only lead to deletion again and a Forum Ban for me..
Recently, a reply by a site administrator was posted (and deleted) which specifically explained that the said accused player was in fact not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt
But I think it would just be fair / the right thing to do: I think the public needs to see what opinion the Site Administrators have on this whole story!
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by AmsterdamnI saw it and I completely agree with you.
I can (want to post) it again, but I'm afraid it will only lead to deletion again and a Forum Ban for me..
But I think it would just be fair / the right thing to do: I think the public needs to see what opinion the Site Administrators have on this whole story!
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by wittywonkaYou think that Forum Mods can delete posts by the Site Admins?????
[b]This is not a cheating allegation. This is simply a statement of facts.
As posted on his website (http://www.clausjensen.com/), cludi has decided to leave in light of recent events.
I for one regret being sucked into the witch-hunt without knowing all of the details. Recently, a reply by a site administrator was posted (and deleted) which s ...[text shortened]... nsider doing the same as cludi.
Best of luck. Please continue to update your blog.
-Witty[/b]
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by AmsterdamnIt might slide if you substitute names...
I can (want to post) it again, but I'm afraid it will only lead to deletion again and a Forum Ban for me..
But I think it would just be fair / the right thing to do: I think the public needs to see what opinion the Site Administrators have on this whole story!
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by wittywonkaThen it should had been deleted if the Site Admin hadn't given permission for it to be posted publicly.
It wasn't a post by an admin. The post was a copy of an e-mail written by an admin (posted by a member).
I didn't see it, but Gatecrasher has stated that it did not say Cludi had been found not guilty but merely that no verdict had been reached. If that is so, his leaving before the process is concluded is strong circumstantial evidence of guilt.
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by no1marauderWell isn't that convenient, it didn't stay around long enough for anyone to get a close look at it!
Then it should had been deleted if the Site Admin hadn't given permission for it to be posted publicly.
I didn't see it, but Gatecrasher has stated that it did not say Cludi had been found not guilty but merely that no verdict had been reached. If that is so, his leaving before the process is concluded is strong circumstantial evidence of guilt.
And we both know that nobody is (nor should be) convicted on "circumstantial" evidence. For that matter, what is the root of this "circumstancial" evidence? Nothing more than rumors!
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by wittywonkaAs far as I can see we have reached the point where mere accusation is sufficient evidence to condemn someone. I hope that the "new" game mods will not have this attitude but I have a suspicion that the lynch mob is about to be given control of the courtroom.
Well isn't that convenient, it didn't stay around long enough for anyone to get a close look at it!
And we both know that nobody is (nor should be) convicted on "circumstantial" evidence. For that matter, what is the root of this "circumstancial" evidence? Nothing more than rumors!
06 Mar 08
Originally posted by wittywonkaPeople get convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time. Esp. when there is also direct evidence as there is in this case i.e. the Game Analysis of one of the strongest players on the site who was also an original Game Mod (and who's joining the Game Mods gave them great credibility from day 1).
Well isn't that convenient, it didn't stay around long enough for anyone to get a close look at it!
And we both know that nobody is (nor should be) convicted on "circumstantial" evidence. For that matter, what is the root of this "circumstancial" evidence? Nothing more than rumors!