Hi all,
Nimzo and I were PMing on the thread, and I mentioned how the position reminds me of the Ruy Lopez whenever I see it. Our talk made me think about how the Colle tends to mimic kingpawn openings from a different move order, so I thought I would see what I could find. Here's some interesting games, especially after 8-12 moves into the game:
First a French
[Event "BRA-ch"]
[Site "Fortaleza"]
[Date "1951.??.??"]
[Round "6"]
[White "De Freitas, Marcio Elisio"]
[Black "Guimaraes, Sergio"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C07"]
[PlyCount "117"]
[EventDate "1951.??.??"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[EventRounds "17"]
[EventCountry "BRA"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2000.11.22"]
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. Ngf3 Bd7 5. c3 Nc6 6. dxc5 Bxc5 7. Bd3 Nge7
8. O-O O-O 9. Re1 h6 10. Bc2 Qc7 11. Qe2{We've seen this before!} Rad8 12. Nb3 Bb6 13. e5 f5 14. Nfd4 Nxd4 15. Nxd4 a6 16. f4 Nc6 17. Be3 Nxd4 18. Bxd4 Bxd4+ 19. cxd4 Rc8 20. Bd3 Qd8 21. Rec1 Qe7 22. Qd2 g5 23. fxg5 Qxg5 24. Qxg5+ hxg5 25. Kf2 Rxc1
26. Rxc1 Rc8 27. Rxc8+ Bxc8 28. g4 fxg4 29. Kg3 Kg7 30. Kxg4 Kh6 31. a4 Bd7 32. a5 Ba4 33. h4 gxh4 34. Kxh4 Bd1 35. Bf1 Bc2 36. Bh3 Bf5 37. Bxf5 exf5
38. Kg3 Kg5 39. Kg2 Kg6 40. Kf3 Kg5 41. Ke3 f4+ 42. Kf2 Kg6 43. Kf3 Kf5 44. b3 Kg5 45. e6 Kf6 46. Kxf4 Kxe6 47. Kg5 Kd6 48. Kf5 Kc6 49. Ke5 b6 50. axb6 Kxb6 51. Kxd5 Kb5 52. Ke5 a5 53. d5 Kb4 54. d6 Kxb3 55. d7 a4 56. d8=Q a3 57. Qb6+ Kc2 58. Qc5+ Kb2 59. Qb4+ 1-0
From a Sicilian (not a perfect match- some important differences, but a reasonable stylistic fit):
[Event "EU-ch 2nd (Women)"]
[Site "Warsaw"]
[Date "2001.04.25"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Bojkovic, Natasa"]
[Black "Javakhishvili, Lela"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B30"]
[WhiteElo "2447"]
[BlackElo "2304"]
[PlyCount "72"]
[EventDate "2001.04.22"]
[EventType "swiss"]
[EventRounds "11"]
[EventCountry "POL"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2001.07.03"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 e6 4. O-O Nge7 5. Nc3 Ng6 6. d3 Be7 7. Ne2 O-O 8. c3
a6 9. Ba4 b5 10. Bc2 d5 11. d4 cxd4 12. Nexd4 Bb7 13. Nxc6 Bxc6 14. Qe2 Qc7 {White has an almost identical position-we're missing a pair of knights- but it's taken 14 moves to get it. Is Black's better or worse with the 3 extra moves?}
15. e5 b4 16. Re1 bxc3 17. bxc3 Bb5 18. Qe3 Rfc8 19. Bd2 Ba3 20. Rab1 Bc4
21. Nd4 Rcb8 22. h4 Nxh4 23. g3 Ng6 24. Kg2 Rxb1 25. Bxb1 Rb8 26. Rh1 Rb2
27. Bxg6 hxg6 28. Bc1 Rxa2 29. Bxa3 Rxa3 30. Qf4 f6 31. Qh4 fxe5 32. Qh8+ Kf7 33. Qh7 g5 34. Nf3 Rxc3 35. Nxg5+ Ke7 36. Qxg7+ Kd6 1-0
Now a Ruy Lopez (The immediate occupation of e5 with a pawn on move one most certainly alters the landscape, and while I did not pick these based on result, Black does win this):
[Event "PER Grand Prix 1st"]
[Site "Lima"]
[Date "2004.??.??"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Grados, Luis"]
[Black "Abarca, Diego"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C24"]
[WhiteElo "2280"]
[BlackElo "2055"]
[PlyCount "58"]
[EventDate "2004.04.12"]
[EventType "swiss"]
[EventRounds "9"]
[EventCountry "PER"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2004.11.15"]
1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 c6 4. Qe2 Be7 5. Nf3 O-O 6. O-O Qc7 7. c3 d5 8. Bb3
Bg4 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Qxf3 Rd8 11. Nd2 Na6 12. Qe2 Nc5 13. Bc2{The bishop arrives on c2 by a very different route, but the black pawn on e5 makes clearing lines much more problematic} dxe4 14. dxe4 a5
15. Re1 a4 16. Nf1 Ne6 17. a3 b5 18. g3 Bc5 19. Kg2 Bb6 20. Ne3 Rd7 21. Bd2
Rad8 22. Rad1 Nh5 23. Qxh5 Rxd2 24. Rxd2 Rxd2 25. Re2 g6 26. Qf3 Ng5 27. Qg4 h5 28. Qxg5 Rxe2 29. Bd1 Bxe3 0-1
I think this is a very good example of how studying Master games in general, including tournament books and "Best Games" books, can benefit someone. Patterns and piece placement tend to recur in a variety of different openings, and a broad exposure to the game can add to pattern recognition, increase strategic understanding, and make planning easier, regardless of the opening one plays.
Paul