In the last 12 months my rating has fluctuated between 1775 and 1557, which seems like quite a wide spread. Over the board I've always been a bit hit and miss - in my last club championship I beat or drew against all the higher graded players and lost to lower graded ones.
So, the question is: can I become more consistent, or should I just carry on trading on my mercurial reputation?
Historical 90 days1 Year5 Years
Highest Rating1704 17751775
Average Rating1646 16541624
Lowest Rating1576 15571444
Notice your average rating really is stable and your graph shows nothing out of the ordinary. As few as 3 or 4 games can cause that daily rating number to bounce around in either direction. At your rating of 1700+, perhaps you should just concentrate on a general approach to improving your game and the rating numbers will follow. Tactics is always a good area of study, maybe going a little deeper into your favorite openings, or renewing your commitment to the "blunder check".
Two books you might want to look at:
The Seven Deadly Chess Sins
Chess for Zebras
both by Jonathan Rowson
These are different from any other chess books I have read. Flip through them quickly from front to back without attempting to read anything, but notice how many fewer diagrams there are as opposed to the normal chess book. Instead you get large blocks of text where Rowson talks about his ideas.
In Zebra he tries to answer 3 questions:
1. Why is it so difficult to improve?
2. What mental attitudes are needed to find good moves?
3. Does it make a difference if you play Black or White
In Seven Deadly he lists the reasons we go wrong with our moves:
1. Thinking
2. Blinking
3. Wanting
4. Materialism
5. Egoism
6. Perfectionism
7. Looseness
Good luck in your games.
Best, Steve
Originally posted by hunterknoxPlace a "Post It" note on your computer that says:
In the last 12 months my rating has fluctuated between 1775 and 1557, which seems like quite a wide spread. Over the board I've always been a bit hit and miss - in my last club championship I beat or drew against all the higher graded players and lost to lower graded ones.
So, the question is: can I become more consistent, or should I just carry on trading on my mercurial reputation?
1. Check all checks- even the seemingly absurd ones.
2. Look for loose pieces- every piece on the board that is unprotected.
Doing this consistently, EVERY MOVE, will not only make your rating stable, it will raise it to over 1800 (by that I mean "RHP site rating" ) rather quickly.
Greenpawn34 wrote a thread a while back about how to raise your RHP rating to over 2000, and it has better and more comprehensive advice, but this is a highly useful anecdote to get you started!
Originally posted by Paul LeggettI can testify to the benefit and success of this mantra
Place a "Post It" note on your computer that says:
1. Check all checks- even the seemingly absurd ones.
2. Look for loose pieces- every piece on the board that is unprotected.
Doing this consistently, EVERY MOVE, will not only make your rating stable, it will raise it to over 1800 (by that I mean "RHP site rating" ) rather quickly.
(my post-it note also says "pawn moves can't be undone" )
Originally posted by Paul Leggettand where there are no checks or loose pieces?
Place a "Post It" note on your computer that says:
1. Check all checks- even the seemingly absurd ones.
2. Look for loose pieces- every piece on the board that is unprotected.
Doing this consistently, EVERY MOVE, will not only make your rating stable, it will raise it to over 1800 (by that I mean "RHP site rating" ) rather quickly.
Greenpa ...[text shortened]... tter and more comprehensive advice, but this is a highly useful anecdote to get you started!
Originally posted by morgskithis is quite interesting and is the reason that i am going to start to play closed
Attack!
systems, for I have reasoned that when the average player cannot attack, he is at a
total loss. I have found this to be true of myself, disengagement is rather unnerving,
we all love to attack and take pieces, even when there is no justification for doing so
and it stands to reason that such a strategy must surely fail, ok, we may get lucky
sometimes, but it cannot be good for our chess in the long term.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is all true, but I feel that a loss from a closed system teaches me much less than a loss from a failed attack. At least with a failed attack you can know not to be so foolhardy in future....
this is quite interesting and is the reason that i am going to start to play closed
systems, for I have reasoned that when the average player cannot attack, he is at a
total loss. I have found this to be true of myself, disengagement is rather unnerving,
we all love to attack and take pieces, even when there is no justification for doing so
...[text shortened]... ly fail, ok, we may get lucky
sometimes, but it cannot be good for our chess in the long term.
That and I cannot stand closed games 😉
Originally posted by morgskiexactly, we cannot stand them because we love to attack, take away our attack and
This is all true, but I feel that a loss from a closed system teaches me much less than a loss from a failed attack. At least with a failed attack you can know not to be so foolhardy in future....
That and I cannot stand closed games 😉
what do we have?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieFor me, not a lot. This game is a perfect example, I couldn't find a way through, nor could he, I offered a draw... Game 8771586
exactly, we cannot stand them because we love to attack, take away our attack and
what do we have?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieclosed games have attack just as much as open ones. if you don't, it's just your bad attacking skills.
exactly, we cannot stand them because we love to attack, take away our attack and
what do we have?
think of it as loading up a spring, building up tension for that inevitable explosion. one gigantic monster wave, instead of bunch of tiny open game ripples. build up the energy, then SMASH! surf the big wave. never let the tension ease down, always build up.
if you're not building up, you're doing it wrong.
Originally posted by wormwoodAgreed.
closed games have attack just as much as open ones. if you don't, it's just your bad attacking skills.
think of it as loading up a spring, building up tension for that inevitable explosion. one gigantic monster wave, instead of bunch of tiny open game ripples. build up the energy, then SMASH! surf the big wave. never let the tension ease down, always build up.
if you're not building up, you're doing it wrong.
Closed games are a test of your planning abilities. Open one's are a test of your foresight (or tactics perhaps). In open games I find you play the sharpest attacks you can until you can find a position to build a plan from and in closed games you build a plan to get an attack built from.
Q
OP-
The best way to get consistency in your game is to focus on the things under your control - i.e. getting rest before a tournament, regular exercise and coming to the board with the mindset that you are ready to fight for a win. Chess is at it's heart a game of mistakes (or small mistakes if you are a master) the best you can do is to try and minimize randomness and show resilience in the face of a difficult situation.
Closed games - I think most players struggle at the initial phase of a closed game when issues of which side of the board to play on, what pawn breaks will you employ etc. are paramount. Fluid pawn structures are typically the most difficult for the club player although they rarely identify the problem and will ascribe their losses to tactics etc.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23315
Originally posted by Paul LeggettI totally believe this to be true... for most casual players (like myself) it's just not going to happen though.
Place a "Post It" note on your computer that says:
1. Check all checks- even the seemingly absurd ones.
2. Look for loose pieces- every piece on the board that is unprotected.
Doing this consistently, EVERY MOVE, will not only make your rating stable, it will raise it to over 1800 (by that I mean "RHP site rating" ) rather quickly.
Greenpa ...[text shortened]... tter and more comprehensive advice, but this is a highly useful anecdote to get you started!