I'm a balanced player but hate playing without initiative or at least decent attacking prospects. I'm currently using the Queen's Indian(sometimes Bogo)/Nimzo Indian vs d4 but have found it sometimes too drawish. I'm considering the Grunfeld, but know next to nothing about it. How would you guys rate this opening? Is it sound? Any information is appreciated. 🙂
I like the Gruenfeld. If black manages to destroy the center he can usually win (at least in my limited experience). I'm thinking of trying the Benko if it gives black more initiative. Can somebody who's played both compare the Gruenfeld to the Benko for me?
Thanks, I'm posting on forums instead of making moves tonight because of the good Wisconsin beer I'm drinking 🙂
The Benko and the Grunfeld are definitely different. Obviously the Benko is a gambit, and black gives up a pawn. Second, the pawn structure in the Benko and the Grunfeld are pretty much as different as it can physically get. The one thing I like about the Benko is black has alot of great positional trumps to work with. He has 1 pawn island, two open files on the queenside, great dark square control, an outrageously strong bishop on g7, etc...
Originally posted by !~TONY~!I love the Benko OTB but for correspondence chess I think a black gambit is dubious (although in most cases i think the gambit is declined now?). I would prefer the Modern Benoni, same sorts of positions with less tactical pitfalls.
The Benko and the Grunfeld are definitely different. Obviously the Benko is a gambit, and black gives up a pawn. Second, the pawn structure in the Benko and the Grunfeld are pretty much as different as it can physically get. The one thing I like about the Benko is black has alot of great positional trumps to work with. He has 1 pawn island, two open files on the queenside, great dark square control, an outrageously strong bishop on g7, etc...
I hate the Grunfeld .. almost as much as i hate Alekhine's defense. But this is entirely a matter of taste, I just don't like breaking the centre, i prefer to fight for it from the start. It certainly isn't an opening for beginners as it requires strong defensive skills (although play it enough and you will learn all about good defense .. the hard way 😉 )
Originally posted by exigentskyBlack holds the initiative in a lot of KI positions. My problem with KI is that it has a MOUNTAIN of theory required to play it well. If you like closed positions though it's certainly a rewarding opening.
I've analyzed the Benko and Bennoni but came to the conclusion that it's not for me at this time. Any other players I should watch for the Grunfeld?
Originally posted by !~TONY~!Its an addictive defense for the closed position lover. Its also a decent "anti-computer" opening as long as the engine doesn't have a huge book (some variations of KI are in books 30 moves deep! Try playing a blitz game against an opponent that doesn't need think time for the first 30 moves 🙂)
I love the KID. I used to play the Semi Slav and love that also, but I have switched the KID more recently looking for something a little different lately.
Originally posted by briancronI forgot all about QGD .. I don't think I've played it in years. Very solid .. very dull 😴
This is an interesting article on this subject.
http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_instrctn_bgnrs/120603_crt_easy_op_rep_bk.html
Silman is suggesting the QGD as a safe easy answer to d4 and he explains his reasoning.