1 edit
Originally posted by MarinkatombI did report about him about week ago before ban. I did suspected him after checking some of his games where he did some "unhuman like" moves. Also his game against Blackbuck in which he did not resign in absolutely hopeless position (as Blackbuck usually dont spend days on move, hoping for timeout was unreal).
Actually i reported him after a blitz game. He/she played some really odd stuff, ie selecting a line that lead to a direct Queen swap yet still thought about it for 10 seconds, which, in a 2 minute game is simply ridiculous, especially for someone graded over 2000. This behaviour just screams engine, he was using the same amount of time on every move whe ...[text shortened]... ible job, he was banned quite quickly so one would assume the evidence was rather over whelming!
Originally posted by aGoRessivEThat's not unusual. If the player uses the same opening all the time he/she starts to get pretty good at it. The overall experience though usually results in a blunder or bad move. Happens to me all the time.
I always wanted to know why moderators knows that somebody is cheating at games. If they takes blitz's reference, for example, It can be a chance to coincide with 7 or 8 consecutive moves, knowing that a computer program makes the best move, I think a good player can do it..
Last week I had a game with a player with 1110 ELO, and the first 20 moves I t ...[text shortened]... r rating..later he/she started to have blunders and I won..but at first it was really suspect..
Originally posted by KorchGame 3295350 and Game 3295349, yes I see what you mean - it's rare for anyone under about 1,400 to carry on when more than a piece down.
I did report about him about week ago before ban. I did suspected him after checking some of his games where he did some "unhuman like" moves. Also his game against Blackbuck in which he did not resign in absolutely hopeless position (as Blackbuck usually dont spend days on move, hoping for timeout was unreal).
Originally posted by KorchWhat exactly is "unhuman like" moves? How would you define that? I make some horrible moves that no human should make, but I blunder away none the less.
I did report about him about week ago before ban. I did suspected him after checking some of his games where he did some "unhuman like" moves. Also his game against Blackbuck in which he did not resign in absolutely hopeless position (as Blackbuck usually dont spend days on move, hoping for timeout was unreal).
1 edit
Originally posted by pawntorook4I calling "Unhuman like moves" moves which does not blunder anything, but makes position worse and usually is recommended by engine.
What exactly is "unhuman like" moves? How would you define that? I make some horrible moves that no human should make, but I blunder away none the less.
Originally posted by pawntorook4Yes, but you being rated 1000's isn't going to show your moves matching an engine. Engines never know what level they are playing against, there was a player rated very high who played to draw a player around your level.
I make moves that make my position worse all the time. In fact when I don't know what to do, I move a pawn or a king.
The stupid computer wanted to keep the score 0 thinking that was best, and the human was too stupid to realize the advice he was getting was a forced draw. So the engine wanted a draw and this user was removed from the site for using an engine to play their games.
P-