Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
Have you ever replayed your games after you were sober? If so, did you look at your plans like, "what the hell was I thinking"?
Lol, yes, this happens all the time. I think it comes down to a number of factors. Firstly we examine too few moves as was highlighted by Varenka in his thread, think like a computer. I find the best is to look for a move and then say to oneself, ok, what is wrong with my move. What i have started to realise is that heaven forbid, our opponent has resources as well! so even though we have a cunning fox like plan which we want to execute, what if our opponent executes his as well? do i have a plan B in that case or can i simply ignore his plan because for I think its faulty. Its really a good habit trying to find plans! They may be very simple? i block his passed pawn, or I exchange his bishop with my knight because i want to dominate the dark squares which he shall find difficult to defend. Sometimes they are very very general, centre is closed, pawn storm the kingside, but of course they need to be checked and verified by looking at variations, i am of course not talking about seven or eight moves ahead, there is no need unless it a huge capturing sequence, just three or four moves suffice.
You have reached sixteen hundred my friend, the difference i have found is that between 1600 and 1800 the final outcome is usually decided with careful play, in the endgame, for our opponents dont give us free pieces like they used to when we were 1200 - 1400. Its an acquired taste the endgame but like a good single malt whiskey you can relish it with a little practice.