Destructive play

Is it good trade a few pieces early on? And is that usually best against better or weaker players? I like to play with fewer pieces (less to think about).

I'd think it'd help a lower rated player the more pieces are traded. Just do what's best for you 🙂

Not necessarily. It may help the lower rated (weaker) player by simplifying the game. At the same time, the lower player rated is probably not as adept in the end game, and that's basically straight where the game goes.

there are many things to consider when trading pieces. What pieces are being traded, current position, (open or closed), who has the initiative, etc. etc. I don't think one's strength alone should be the determining factor as to whether or not you trade off pieces

I see often that lower rated players will trade always. Not always is this a good idea. It simplifies the game which may or may not benefit either player. Theoretically trading off pieces simplifies the game, but trading off bishops for instance determine what squares each side can and cannot control. When trading always look at your opponents next move and your next move. If you don't see a good position then it may not be good to trade off pieces.

Obviously a weaker player has to back it up with good play, and make sure he isn't weaking his position by trading.

Originally posted by MilkyJoe
Is it good trade a few pieces early on? And is that usually best against better or weaker players? I like to play with fewer pieces (less to think about).