Go back
Duras Gambit

Duras Gambit

Only Chess

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
15 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

1.e4 f5

Crazy stuff - I'd never seen it before, and on a whim my friend played it against me. The game followed 2.exf4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bd3 when he decided to go crazy and play 4...Ng4 5.h3 Nxf2? 6.Kxf2 when I had no problem defending. However, I think that if he'd been playing seriously he may have had some solid chances, with smooth development and the initiative for the pawn (Maybe 4...e5 5.fxe6 Bxe6 would have been interesting). Anyhow, anybody ever played against it or with it? It seems quite playable.

Y

Joined
29 Jul 06
Moves
2414
Clock
15 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

my friend experimented with it against me, he lost miserably

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
15 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by YUG0slav
my friend experimented with it against me, he lost miserably
Here's something crazy that F9 came up with....


[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[Annotator "CMSMaster"]
[PlyCount "76"]

1. e4 f5 2. exf5 Nf6 3. d4 d6 4. Bd3 e5 5. fxe6 Bxe6 6. Nf3 Bg4 7. O-O Be7 8.
Re1 O-O 9. c3 d5 10. Bg5 c6 11. Qb3 Bxf3 12. Qxb7 Nbd7 13. gxf3 Rb8 14. Qxc6
Rb6 15. Qa4 Rxb2 16. Qxa7 Rf7 17. Qa6 Qc7 18. Bf5 Rxf2 19. f4 Ne4 20. Bxe4 dxe4
21. Kxf2 Bxg5 22. Kg1 Qxf4 23. Rf1 Qg4+ 24. Kh1 Nf6 25. a4 Bh6 26. Ra2 e3 27.
Qc6 e2 28. Re1 Ne4 29. Raxe2 Qf3+ 30. Kg1 Qg4+ 31. Rg2 Be3+ 32. Kh1 Qf3 33. Qe6
Ng3+ 34. hxg3 Qh5+ 35. Rh2 Qf3+ 36. Rg2 Qh5+ 37. Rh2 Qf3+ 38. Rg2 Qh5+ 1/2-1/2

G

Stockholm, Sweden

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
3059
Clock
15 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Let go of those f-pawns, cms.. 😉

!~TONY~!
1...c5!

Your Kingside

Joined
28 Sep 01
Moves
40665
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

My friend, who is about 2100 USCF, used to play this crap against me all the time, and actually beat me a couple times, with this line:

1. e4 f5 2. ef Kf7 3. Qh5+ g6 4. fg Kg7

Ridiculous.

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
16 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
My friend, who is about 2100 USCF, used to play this crap against me all the time, and actually beat me a couple times, with this line:

1. e4 f5 2. ef Kf7 3. Qh5+ g6 4. fg Kg7

Ridiculous.
Hahaha, lmao, I think I'd refuse to play him again if he beat me with that.

DD
Stealer of Souls

Waiting for You

Joined
16 Feb 07
Moves
119052
Clock
27 Feb 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by cmsMaster
1.e4 f5

Crazy stuff - I'd never seen it before, and on a whim my friend played it against me. The game followed 2.exf4 Nf6 3.d4 d6 4.Bd3 when he decided to go crazy and play 4...Ng4 5.h3 Nxf2? 6.Kxf2 when I had no problem defending. However, I think that if he'd been playing seriously he may have had some solid chances, with smooth development and the ...[text shortened]... en interesting). Anyhow, anybody ever played against it or with it? It seems quite playable.
This is not a gambit. This is called the Fred Defense. I made a thread about this about a week ago. You should check it out. It's called "The Fred should be dead". 😕

9

Joined
01 Feb 07
Moves
7819
Clock
27 Feb 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

I've played this opening quite a bit and won a few games on RHP against 1200-1300 rated opponents. It's fun to play but Black will usually get slaughtered unless he can create immediate weaknesses in White's position.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
27 Feb 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by !~TONY~!
My friend, who is about 2100 USCF, used to play this crap against me all the time, and actually beat me a couple times, with this line:

1. e4 f5 2. ef Kf7 3. Qh5+ g6 4. fg Kg7

Ridiculous.
He doesn't happen to live in Iowa does he? Our statewide publication the En Passant featured an article by a local expert (hes now pushing master) where he talked about training games played with that line....

9

Joined
01 Feb 07
Moves
7819
Clock
27 Feb 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Chessgames.com only has 8 games with this position so it must be considered inferior by most...

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/explorer?node=1396348&move=2&moves=e4.f5&nodes=21720.1396348

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
27 Feb 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dutch Defense
This is not a gambit. This is called the Fred Defense. I made a thread about this about a week ago. You should check it out. It's called "The Fred should be dead". 😕
It's also called the Duras Gambit, it is a gambit - and it's F U N! 😛

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.