Originally posted by KrezayTechnique for the Tournament Player by Dvoretsky
Hey guys, I was wondering what endgame books you would recommend for a +- 1900 rated RHP player.
I haven't really studied endgames at all, mostly tactics and openings. It's about darn time...
Thanks for any help.
Practical Rook Endings by Korchnoi
Originally posted by KrezayOriginally posted by Krezay
Hey guys, I was wondering what endgame books you would recommend for a +- 1900 rated RHP player.
I haven't really studied endgames at all, mostly tactics and openings. It's about darn time...
Thanks for any help.
Hey guys, I was wondering what endgame books you would recommend for a +- 1900 rated RHP player.
I haven't really studied endgames at all, mostly tactics and openings. It's about darn time...
Thanks for any help.
Silman's Complete Endgame Course by Jeremy Silman. I am just reading it, and it's great since it starts from the stuff for beginners and slowly goes up to experts. Highly recommended.
Originally posted by KrezayI'd suggest
Hey guys, I was wondering what endgame books you would recommend for a +- 1900 rated RHP player.
I haven't really studied endgames at all, mostly tactics and openings. It's about darn time...
Thanks for any help.
Capablanca's Best Chess Endings
Ruben Fines Basic Chess Endgames
Muller and Lamprecht's Fundamental Chess Endings
Essential Chess Endings: The Tournament Player's Guide by James Howell
Jeremy Silmans Complete endgame course
Fines Book alone could you busy for a year or two.
Originally posted by gundelI agree that it is the greatest book, and he is the best author, but not for a player above 1900. He barely touches on that material. When you pass 1900 you need Dvoretsky, Averbakh, Korchnoi, etc.
Originally posted by Krezay
[b]Hey guys, I was wondering what endgame books you would recommend for a +- 1900 rated RHP player.
I haven't really studied endgames at all, mostly tactics and openings. It's about darn time...
Thanks for any help.
Silman's Complete Endgame Course by Jeremy Silman. I am just reading it, and it's great since it starts from the stuff for beginners and slowly goes up to experts. Highly recommended.[/b]
I would give anything if Silman would write material for > 1900. I've been through this discussion before. He write for the market and as you can see from the statistical analysis I did of this site the market is 1200-1600. It's not worth his time to write material for players above that level. He paid his dues on his first endgame book. Now, he's doing it for the money. I can't blame him. He is truely a master with words. Dvoretsky and Averbakh do it for the love of the game. I just wish Silman could teach them to write. 🙂
Originally posted by agentrenoBesides, how many years have I read correction to this book in Chess Life & Review? Of course, you would learn a lot working these problems and figuring out the answers to these mistakes and misprints. We need a new version of Fine's book edited by Silman with algebraic notation and new additions to illustrate new discoveries since it's publication.
If you're considering getting Fine's book, I'd advise that it is very dry and verbose - I treat my copy more like a reference book than a study aid. I don't think many people have the patience to learn from a book like this.
Again, it is a great book. Most of the older grandmasters have used this book as their primary source of information about the endgame.
I was at a chess club recently and this topic was discussed. Most of the newest grandmasters today don't even read books. They depend entirely on databases and database tools for their research.
Originally posted by petrovitchWell, I am about 1900 player here, but I found Silman'ss section for 1600-1799 players new for me, very instructional and inspiring, I did not touch the part for 2000 players yet, and may agree with you, but still Silman gives great basics
I agree that it is the greatest book, and he is the best author, but not for a player above 1900. He barely touches on that material. When you pass 1900 you need Dvoretsky, Averbakh, Korchnoi, etc.
I would give anything if Silman would write material for > 1900. I've been through this discussion before. He write for the market and as you can see fr ...[text shortened]... Averbakh do it for the love of the game. I just wish Silman could teach them to write. 🙂
Originally posted by lumaxYes, I can't believe I didn't mention it. I even broke the binding and had Chernov's Endgame book spiral bound. I carry it with me everywhere I go. I've been through it countless times and still charish it. The format is unlike most other chess books. Pandolfini has come close to it a few times, but the format is unique, and easy to study. The inclusion of many of N. Grigoriev's compositions alone is worth the price of the book.
chernovs endings rule and the 20 golden rules of endgame by grivas
Does anyone know where I can find a compilation of Grigoriev's work? I've seen reference to books long out of print. How about pgn files? I've only found a dozen or so of his problems and I've read about more than 200 compositions.