Originally posted by Ponderable It is already under attack from the Knight...
??? A diagonal is already under attack by a knight?
The horsey moves like an L, son... it can't attack a diagonal.
I know you were talking about the knight that sits on said diagonal but I was clearly not talking about that knight because I'm pretty sure that if I was, I would have said so.
The knight can discover two diagonals and one isn't being utilized. A different layout of the pieces in order to utilize both diagonals should be possible... hence why I believe 10 is not the maximum.
Originally posted by iChopWoodForFree ??? A diagonal is already under attack by a knight?
The horsey moves like an L, son... it can't attack a diagonal.
I know you were talking about the knight that sits on said diagonal but I was clearly not talking about that knight because I'm pretty sure that if I was, I would have said so.
The knight can discover two diagonals and one isn ...[text shortened]... order to utilize both diagonals should be possible... hence why I believe 10 is not the maximum.
On the second diagonal there is already a piece which is attacked by the Knight. The position in Question id d4 in the diagram, actually occupied by an L-shaped moving Knight. A bishop or Queen attacking the diagonal would sit on f6 or g7 or h8 but still can only attack d4 which is already attacked by my L-shaped moving Knight.
[pgn]
[FEN "1Q1K4/R3R3/8/N1PBN3/1BPn3r/3rb3/8/k7 b - - 0 1"]
{No white pieces attacked} Nc6+ { 10 pieces attacked. This is probably the maximum.}
[/pgn]
Originally posted by Ponderable On the second diagonal there is already a piece which is attacked by the Knight. The position in Question id d4 in the diagram, actually occupied by an L-shaped moving Knight. A bishop or Queen attacking the diagonal would sit on f6 or g7 or h8 but still can only attack d4 which is already attacked by my L-shaped moving Knight.
You aren't getting it. Forget the position in the diagram. The point is a knight can discover two diagonals wherever it moves unless it is on the edge of the board... That is why I said that the aforementioned position could not be the maximum number of pieces that could be attacked.
Originally posted by iChopWoodForFree You aren't getting it. Forget the position in the diagram. The point is a knight can discover two diagonals wherever it moves unless it is on the edge of the board... That is why I said that the aforementioned position could not be the maximum number of pieces that could be attacked.
Set up a diagram shwong your point then.
You will discover that the Knight has a limited reach (by his L-shaped move) a figure on the diagonal the Knight is freeing is always covered by that Knight on his new position...