Game 870894
Walloped, mated in 10 moves, and couldn't do anything to stop it, against a 1300 rated player. Typical loss by myself, all effort wasted, all rating wasted, nothing ventured, nothing learned, practice does not make perfect.
I really have to wonder what goes through god's mind, if there is a god, when I lose weird games like this to lower raters time after time in the opening when I study stuff and have a dedication to the game that such players probably never have, as they are just casual players. It's as if he's saying, "you lose no matter how hard you work, see? Your purpose in life is to be a vegetable, that's what I made you for, you're not supposed to be smart or important, so quit trying and know your role, may I have fries with that?" What a senile being this god is, lol.
On the flip side of things, I expect a lot of ppl to accuse me of cheating. This game looks very similar to JW's loss against darvley and JW was about my rating at the time that game leaked out. 1600 raters just don't do what I did this game, and I wish I could explain why I was so stupid, but I can't. I'm just stupid, I wasn't always stupid until I was 13 and my parents shoved me with drugs, but I'm very stupid now, and ppl who lose to me, for whatever reason, I guess are just stupider, and many times I wonder myself how that is even possible.
I honestly don't know why I lose, but it's a paradox, many times I honestly don't know why I win either. Well, I do in a sense, I think I win because my position is better, or my endgame is better, but when I look at games like this, I wonder about my judgement on any such things and I just wonder if my opponents are quite simply dumb themselves and I've been lucky to land a lot of dumb, overated, opponents to inflate my rating.
I expect the cheating accusations to flow, especially considering I named a few names in cheating threads on the site. I knew this would come because I knew this game was over after the white pawn push, I stalled the game a bit, then figured, wtf the point, just play on the innevitable and take the heat sooner then later.
The game is in the 2005 championships, I'm sure many see it. I'm 0-3 in the 2005 anyways, lost the first two games against the top rater in my pool, then lost one quickly to a 1300, I have no shot in he** of winning the round or even placing 2nd already, so I expect a lot of my remaining 2005 championship games, which are useless flak really, to be a little loose. And I expect the accusations of me cheating will come soon. . .
Greyeyes, I can't beleive I'm asking you a favour, you probably won't help, but when this time does come, and it will, I need a solid alabi to prove I don't cheat, and I think you know there's no possible way in he** that I cheat, and it should be easy for you to prove that I don't. . . Find my best games, and leave without any doubt, that me cheating is impossible.
Originally posted by mateuloseWTF!!!!
Game 870894
Walloped, mated in 10 moves, and couldn't do anything to stop it, against a 1300 rated player. Typical loss by myself, all effort wasted, all rating wasted, nothing ventured, nothing learned, practice does not make perfect.
I really have to wonder what goes through god's mind, if there is a god, when I lose weird games like this ...[text shortened]... t I don't. . . Find my best games, and leave without any doubt, that me cheating is impossible.
Please calm down before you post in future or just shut up - one or the other.
If you had not brought attention to this game I am pretty sure no-one would have analysed it!
😴😴😴😴😴
Originally posted by rhbSomeone would of found it, for sure, don't deny this, I'm sure no1marauder already found it, and maybe he shut up for my own good, thanks no1, BUT, the fact is, I'm a "popular" poster here, for bad reasons, and SOMEBODY would of found this game eventually, as you know, it would be chaos. I'm leting the RHP community know, I'm not hiding this game, I know I played like crap, I acknowledge I played like crap, I even admire the little tactic as I didn't think it was possible to be mated in 10 moves with a Caro (maybe a Sicilian that would be possible), although I have to admit white's opening wasn't that good even despite this (traded good bishop for bad one ASAP), and I was as clueless as it came until the pawn push, just bring it on now.
WTF!!!!
Please calm down before you post in future or just shut up - one or the other.
If you had not brought attention to this game I am pretty sure no-one would have analysed it!
😴😴😴😴😴
I'd rather face the music now, then later, and look like a coward. So, I'm being brave, perhabs foolish, so be it. . .
Originally posted by mateuloseApologies - I forgot that this site revolves around you.
Someone would of found it, for sure, don't deny this, I'm sure no1marauder already found it, and maybe he shut up for my own good, thanks no1, BUT, the fact is, I'm a "popular" poster here, for bad reasons, and SOMEBODY would of foun ...[text shortened]... ike a coward. So, I'm being brave, perhabs foolish, so be it. . .
Nevermind that though... try to consider that you were (before you lost) playing 22 games with a tight time control, plus 12 other games.
It is reasonable to expect you might make an error in one of these games and lose to a lower rated player.
So my advice - get over it, stop whining about it, and learn to accept that you are human and prone to making mistakes (as most of us here are).
Edit:
P.s. There is a distinct difference between 'Frequency' and 'Popularity'.
Originally posted by rhbI'm just saying the game looks a lot like the JW vs darvley game, and we know how famous that game became. The similarities are so close it's dangerous if anyone ever accuses me of cheating, so I had to prepare in some way. Perhabs I prepared wrong by saying, "HERE IT IS" before anything happened, I don't know, but I felt like I had to do something, a knee jerk reaction.
Apologies - I forgot that this site revolves around you.
Nevermind that though... try to consider that you were (before you lost) playing 22 games with a tight time control, plus 12 other games.
It is reasonable to expect you might make an error in one of these games and lose to a lower rated player.
So my advice - get over it, stop whining about it, ...[text shortened]... are).
Edit:
P.s. There is a distinct difference between 'Frequency' and 'Popularity'.
Originally posted by mateuloseUnfortunately, the grind of actually having a profession and life to run + playing 50 games at a time on this site, most against top 100 players, + managing a clan has cut into the time I have to offer advice to someone who won't listen to a word of it. If you didn't learn from that game that you shouldn't let a White pawn reach e6 then you are hopeless; 6 ...... e6 leaves the game perfectly even.
Someone would of found it, for sure, don't deny this, I'm sure no1marauder already found it, and maybe he shut up for my own good, thanks no1, BUT, the fact is, I'm a "popular" poster here, for bad reasons, and SOMEBODY would of found this game eventually, as you know, it would be chaos. I'm leting the RHP community know, I'm not hiding this game, I ...[text shortened]... ic now, then later, and look like a coward. So, I'm being brave, perhabs foolish, so be it. . .
Originally posted by no1marauderAs silly as this may sound, my "plan" was to play Nd7 and then e6 thinking there was no difference at the time. God, I hate book openings, just the move order makes a huge difference. Don't do the right move order in a book opening and the silly openings beat you everytime. Peeves me off, I guess I need to use databases because I cannot remember to perfect detail the correct move order, my memory is kinda swiss cheese anyways.
Unfortunately, the grind of actually having a profession and life to run + playing 50 games at a time on this site, most against top 100 players, + managing a clan has cut into the time I have to offer advice to someone who won't listen to a word of it. If you didn't learn from that game that you shouldn't let a White pawn reach e6 then you are hopeless; 6 ...... e6 leaves the game perfectly even.
Originally posted by mateuloseApart from a complete lack of caring whether u win, loose or draw, in any circumstances. Here's a rather similar embaressing game from me...
Game 870894
Walloped, mated in 10 moves, and couldn't do anything to stop it, against a 1300 rated player. Typical loss by myself, all effort wasted, all rating wasted, nothing ventured, nothing learned, practice does not make perfect.
I really have to wonder what goes through god's mind, if there is a god, when I lose weird games like this ...[text shortened]... t I don't. . . Find my best games, and leave without any doubt, that me cheating is impossible.
Game 633979
D
Originally posted by RagnorakOMG! i think you guys are underestimating your opponents. Like I heard somewhere before on this forum: "play against the board not the rating"
Apart from a complete lack of caring whether u win, loose or draw, in any circumstances. Here's a rather similar embaressing game from me...
Game 633979
D
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardNope, it had nothing whatsoever to do with rating. I was hungover.
OMG! i think you guys are underestimating your opponents. Like I heard somewhere before on this forum: "play against the board not the rating"
Oh, I see why it looks like an even more ridiculous loss than it was. He was 1460 and I was 1600 at the time. No excuse, I know.
D
Originally posted by mateuloseIf you are going to blame god for your losses, will you give him credit for your wins?
Game 870894
Walloped, mated in 10 moves, and couldn't do anything to stop it, against a 1300 rated player. Typical loss by myself, all effort wasted, all rating wasted, nothing ventured, nothing learned, practice does not make p ...[text shortened]... ames, and leave without any doubt, that me cheating is impossible.
All you had to do was play e6 on move 6 and you'd be fine. You fell into a simple opening trap (we all do), so you say to yourself (and mean it) I won't do that AGAIN. And you won't. You'll play e6 and the game will take a lot longer. What you shouldn't do is switch openings and start relearning everything again. I don't know where you got the idea the Caro is devoid of traps and tactics. There's plenty, especially against f7. When I screw myself like that i say to myself i'm in violation of one of the primary rules of chess: ALWAYS look at ALL responses to my move before making it. Of course, I'll make slips, but that's because I screwed up the rule. So if i lose, it'll take a lot longer. I was going to say (like so many others) get a book on the Caro and read it. But that might not do any good. I checked "Starting Out: the caro-kann" by Joe Gallagher. According to that book you were playing the Short System of the Advance variation. Normally, black plays e6 on move ...4. But nowhere in the book does it explain the dire consequences of delaying the move with the white e pawn with space in front of it. As I said before most of these authors don't explain the whys and what if's of a position. Mateulose's mistake will be included in my new book "Chess Traps for Dummies" (no offense, Mateulose, since we are all dummies some of the time). I thought white played a very good game, regardless of his rating and should be given credit for having a sharp tactical eye.
Originally posted by mateuloseMateulose, here's the trick with chess .. what counts is tactics ... where the pieces are, where you move them to, what order you make the moves. Practically every game is decided by whether you or your opponent makes the first, last or worst tactical blunder .. it's no good deciding on moves on strategic grounds unless you've already analysed the tactics in the position, other wise you'll end up with a better pawn structure but a queen down
As silly as this may sound, my "plan" was to play Nd7 and then e6 thinking there was no difference at the time. God, I hate book openings, just the move order makes a huge difference. Don't do the right move order in a book opening and the silly openings beat you everytime.