Go back
Fantastic Winning by Topalov in game 9. Topalov...

Fantastic Winning by Topalov in game 9. Topalov...

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Fantastic Winning by Topalov in game 9. Topalov Kramnik: 5-4.

Topalov dominant as usual.
This seems to be like a boxing match where Kramnik gets punched and doesn't know what hit him.

I would like all the games to be played. All 12. I would even like to see 2 extra games played since there were 2 days break out of the schedule, and because of the forced winning. To prove to the chess world (a couple of more times) who is the undisputed World Chess Champion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

All the drama has gotten to Kramnik. KRamnik was demolishing him in the beginning!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
All the drama has gotten to Kramnik. KRamnik was demolishing him in the beginning!
Excuse my question Falco Lombardy,

What is your true chess rating?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Out of mild intrest, whats your chess rating Los Angeles?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Los Angeles
Excuse my question Falco Lombardy,

What is your true chess rating?
Excuse my question Los Angeles, are you "old enough" to post in the forum? Or are you one of those cowboys who join just to troll in the forums? Or do you have another account here?

How do you start a topic and are now deviating already?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Los Angeles
Excuse my question Falco Lombardy,

What is your true chess rating?
What is ironic is you haven't even made a move! Yet you are questioning my strength?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
All the drama has gotten to Kramnik. KRamnik was demolishing him in the beginning!
are you kidding me, did you even watch the game, one of the reasons kramnik lost was he couldnt get right in the opening, even gm commentators on icc were saying this, you dont know what youre talking about....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
Excuse my question Los Angeles, are you "old enough" to post in the forum? Or are you one of those cowboys who join just to troll in the forums? Or do you have another account here?

How do you start a topic and are now deviating already?
We have the right to be here. If we want to join just to troll around in the forums then we can.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
We have the right to be here. If we want to join just to troll around in the forums then we can.
You do not need a PhD in statistics to know of the co-relation between trolls - multiple account users and little or no moves made. No coincidence then of the number of postings these users make ... do you fall in this category?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
You do not need a PhD in statistics to know of the co-relation between trolls - multiple account users and little or no moves made. No coincidence then of the number of postings these users make ... [b]do you fall in this category?[/b]
So now you just blatantly insult us? What a loser...


Judging by the date when Los Angeles joined (and the fact that he is not playing) - he could be the member of Danailov's team with the only goal to spread lies in chess forums.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
So now you just blatantly insult us? What a loser...
Do you feel insulted? How do you think others feel when people join the site and "machine gun" the forum without making a single move? We are not that stupid you know.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 7ate9
3 more draws would make it interesting.
I think Topalov will win at least one more.
That'l be real hard for Kramnik to do IMO.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Los Angeles
I think Topalov will win at least one more.
That'l be real hard for Kramnik to do IMO.
Is that a case of you'd like to decline to comment on your rating? 🙂