Gambits... do you use them?

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Yes, it's an EXTREMELY famous article...The story to my knowledge goes that...
In a famous game between Fischer and Spassky the King's gambit was played. Spassky along with many other young Russian Grandmastes had been using this opening a lot, and quite often with success! So, Spassky played it against Fischer, and surprisingly, scored a win! Fischer ...[text shortened]... g around the web. If you are interested you can google it. I have read it, pretty cool.

It seems Fischer didn't know the meaning of the word bust.

Also, giving away material for a mate or to win back material with interest after a tactic is not a gambit. At all.

Originally posted by cmsMaster
Funny story about this whole thing.

This thread gave me an interest to try out the KG. First game, I won, in 8 moves. Second game, I won, in 15 moves, then somebody mentioned me, because I mentioned this on the FICS server, and they said they played the KG a lot. They said they were 2000+ and it's the only opening they used. Played me, taught me a c ...[text shortened]... . It was awesome, but I'm not sure whether I should start playing this opening or not now....

It's probably not the opening. Against that kind of player, you would have lost anyway.

Originally posted by Bedlam
I think you dont know jack. 😛 Maybe someone should phone up Morozviech, Polgar, Topalov etc and tell them that they have been playing chess wrong all these years. Aommaster has shown us the light!

Basicly a gambit gives up static values (ie material) for dynamic compensaion (ie space, control, development) Take the KG for example after 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 ...[text shortened]... r a pawn or g5.......weakening of the kingside.

I would go on and on but you can look it up.

I totally understand what a gambit is meant to do (perhaps I did not explain it very well), but, sometimes, I just feel that some of my gambits go down the drain, because, although I do get a good bunch of developed and active pieces, I find the opponent uses a counter which reduces this.

I then start to think "why did I gambit in the first place?"

However, I do tend to use gambits later on in the game (I tend to gambit a pawn especially if the opponent's pawn structure is very good).

As I said again, I am not as good as some of you guys, and hence, I am just trying to learn. No need to flame me Bedlam!🙂

Originally posted by TheDarkKnight
ive never read it, but ive heard that fischer wrote an article, "bust to the kings gambit" or something like that, and it was so convincing that the kings gambit became much less used by strong players, but that might have changed since.

The move that "busts" the King Gambit is d6.

As in

e4 e5
f4 exf
Nf3 d6! (Fischer's exclamation point.)

The KG wasn't getting played all that often at the time Bobby wrote the article.

As far as I know Black has the King's Gambit under control at the Super GM level. Check out the King's Gambit in the movie From Russia With Love. White is Spassky and Black is Bronstein. Poor Bronstein. Spassky played a dynamic game.

Playing real gambits ( I don't include the queen's gambit as one) is dangerous in correspondence as the opposing player has time to consider his move and consult vast databases. Two of the great advantages of gambits: shock value and preparation are thus negated. There are some exceptions, like king's gambit, which is still being debated after all these years. You just hate to get caught in a game with a pawn down, being slowly ground into an endgame. takes all the fun out of playing them.

Originally posted by exigentsky
It's probably not the opening. Against that kind of player, you would have lost anyway.

I know that I lost because he was 2000+, but then I tested it out on my own. And, I thought I mentioned this..but my results were, 3-0 win in 8 (unrated), win in 15 (unrated), and win in 20 something (rated against a 1470, my rating was about 1320. So, I'm feeling that this opening might suit my play well. I'm still not convinced black truly has this opening handled at any level. Check out the Spassky-Seirawan game from 1985. Spassky slaughtered Seirawan in 32 moves, and also check out the Spassky-Bronstein game that you mentioned, Spassky dominates Bronsteing in (I think) 23 moves. I think it's a solid attacking opening, especially at the club level.

Originally posted by Red Night
The move that "busts" the King Gambit is d6.

As in

e4 e5
f4 exf
Nf3 d6! (Fischer's exclamation point.)

The KG wasn't getting played all that often at the time Bobby wrote the article.

Yes, that's the "bust" move. But, I don't think that it is truly "busted". There are ways to beat this response...

Originally posted by Akashic
Since Oddjob291 doesn't seem to be active anymore I extend the challenge to anyone who wants to play.

Here is the result of the Milner-Barry gambit game:

Game 2118293

If anyone else wants to try the Black side feel free to message me.

Originally posted by TheDarkKnight
ive never read it, but ive heard that fischer wrote an article, "bust to the kings gambit" or something like that, and it was so convincing that the kings gambit became much less used by strong players, but that might have changed since.

Fischer went on to play the KG after he wrote that.

Originally posted by gambit3
As far as I know Black has the King's Gambit under control at the Super GM level. Check out the King's Gambit in the movie From Russia With Love. White is Spassky and Black is Bronstein. Poor Bronstein. Spassky played a dynamic game.

Didnt Morozveich hammer Anand in a KG? 🙂


[Event "RUS Moscow Kremlin"]
[Site "RUS Moscow Kremlin"]
[Date "1995.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "A Morozevich"]
[Black "Anand Viswanathan (IND)"]
[ECO "C33"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "56"]

1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 c6
5.Bb3 d5 6.exd5 cxd5 7.d4 Bb4 8.Nf3 O-O
9.O-O Bxc3 10.bxc3 Qc7 11.Qe1 Nc6 12.Qh4 Ne7
13.Bxf4 Qxc3 14.Bd2 Qc7 15.Ne5 Nf5 16.Qf4 Be6
17.Bb4 Rfc8 18.g4 Nd6 19.Rae1 Nfe4 20.c4 dxc4
21.Bc2 Nf6 22.g5 Nh5 23.Qf3 g6 24.Nxg6 hxg6
25.Bxg6 fxg6 26.Rxe6 Qf7 27.Qd5 Nf5 28.Rxf5 1-0

Originally posted by buddy2
Playing real gambits ( I don't include the queen's gambit as one) is dangerous in correspondence as the opposing player has time to consider his move and consult vast databases. Two of the great advantages of gambits: shock value and preparation are thus negated. There are some exceptions, like king's gambit, which is still being debated after all these yea ...[text shortened]... ith a pawn down, being slowly ground into an endgame. takes all the fun out of playing them.

I dont believe the two greatest asset of a gambit is shock valueand preperation, I play the KG all the time otb and none is ever shocked. Gambits give up static value for dynamic compensaion. 3 tempi = 1 pawn, you really cant get past it. Super GMs give up pawns all the time, not only in the opening but often in the middle game to gain the gambit value of the pawn, ie space, squares for pieces (control), tempi or to disrupt the other players structure or control.


Basicly (and im not saying this to you Buddy2) anyone saying that a gambited pawn doesnt get compensation even in correspondence chess doesnt understand chess at all.

Originally posted by aommaster
I totally understand what a gambit is meant to do (perhaps I did not explain it very well), but, sometimes, I just feel that some of my gambits go down the drain, because, although I do get a good bunch of developed and active pieces, I find the opponent uses a counter which reduces this.

I then start to think "why did I gambit in the first place?"

H ...[text shortened]... good as some of you guys, and hence, I am just trying to learn. No need to flame me Bedlam!🙂

I wasnt flaming you, I was stating that I thought you knew jack based on the comment.

"From what I have seen of gambits, they seem to be giving away material for free, since the gain, in my opinion is not big at all, or can be countered extremely easily"


Dont take it to heart its just what I think.

If your pieces are active and theirs are inactive and you cant turn that into a winning advantage then you need to study how the romantic players did this. Not all of it is sound today ie danish gambit but theres a lot to be learnt.

High end GMs playing the KG........


[Event "5th IECC Playoff Final"]
[Site "Antalya TUR"]
[Date "2004.??.??"]
[White "Ivanchuk,V"]
[Black "Nikolic,Pr"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2716"]
[BlackElo "2648"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "1"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 d6 5. d4 Be6 6. Qd3 Nf6 7. Nf3 Qg4
8. Nc3 Be7 9. h3 Qg6 10. Bxf4 O-O 11. Re1 Nh5 12. Bh2 Ng3+ 13. Bxg3 Qxg3 14. Ne2 Qg6
15. Nf4 Qh6 16. g3 Nd7 17. Kg2 Nb6 18. Bxe6 fxe6 19. Rhf1 c5 20. d5 Rxf4 21. gxf4 Qxf4
22. dxe6 Rf8 23. b4 Rf6 24. Qb5 Rxe6 25. bxc5 Bh4 26. Nxh4 Qxh4 27. Qb3 d5 28. cxb6 1-0

[Event "EuCh-Internet KO"]
[Site "playchess.com INT"]
[Date "2004.??.??"]
[White "Short,N"]
[Black "Bacrot,E"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2687"]
[BlackElo "2718"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "1.3"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nf3 Bxc3 7. dxc3 c6
8. Bb3 Qxd1+ 9. Kxd1 Nh5 10. Ke2 Bg4 11. Kf2 Nd7 12. Re1 O-O 13. Bc4 Rfe8 14. b4 h6
15. a4 g5 16. a5 Nhf6 17. Bd3 Ne5 18. Bb2 Nfd7 19. h4 f6 20. c4 Rad8 21. c5 Kf7
22. a6 b5 23. cxb6 Nxb6 24. Nxe5+ fxe5 25. hxg5 hxg5 26. Rh1 Kg6 27. Bc3 Bc8 28. Rh2 g4
29. g3 fxg3+ 30. Kxg3 Rf8 31. Rah1 Rf3+ 32. Kg2 Rh3 33. Bxe5 Nd7 34. Bd4 Nb8 35. Bxa7 Nxa6
36. Bb6 Re8 37. Ba5 Rxh2+ 38. Rxh2 Nb8 39. Bb6 Nd7 40. Bd4 Ne5 41. Bxe5 Rxe5 42. Kg3 c5
43. b5 Bb7 44. Kf4 Re8 45. Kxg4 c4 46. Kf4 cxd3 47. cxd3 Bc8 48. b6 Bd7 49. b7 Rb8
50. Rb2 Kf7 51. Rb6 Ke7 52. Ke5 Ba4 53. d4 Kd7 54. d5 Kc7 55. Rb4 Bd7 56. Kf6 Rxb7
57. Rxb7+ Kxb7 58. e5 Kc7 59. e6 Ba4 60. Ke7 Kc8 61. d6 Bd7 62. exd7+ Kb7 63. d8=Q Ka7
64. Qc7+ Ka8 65. Qc5 Kb7 66. d7 Ka6 67. d8=Q Kb7 68. Qdb6+ Ka8 69. Qca5+ 1-0

[Event "Amber Blindfold"]
[Site "Monaco MNC"]
[Date "2002.??.??"]
[White "Morozevich,A"]
[Black "Almasi,Z"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2742"]
[BlackElo "2644"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "1"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O c6
8. Bc4 Bg4 9. d3 Nh5 10. Ne2 Nd7 11. c3 Ba5 12. d4 c5 13. Nxf4 cxd4 14. cxd4 Bb6
15. Nd5 Nhf6 16. Bg5 h6 17. Bxf6 Nxf6 18. Qd3 Nxd5 19. Bxd5 Be6 20. Bxb7 Rb8 21. Ba6 Bg4
22. Rad1 Qd6 23. e5 Qb4 24. a3 Qe7 25. Kh1 Rbd8 26. Qc3 Be6 27. Bc4 Bd5 28. Bxd5 Rxd5
29. h3 Rfd8 30. Rd2 Qe6 31. Rfd1 Qd7 32. Qc2 Qe6 33. Qe4 f5 34. Qc2 g5 35. Rf1 f4
36. Qe4 Kg7 37. b4 Qg6 38. Re1 h5 39. a4 g4 40. Nh4 Qg5 41. Nf5+ Kh8 42. h4 Qg6
43. a5 Bc7 44. Ne7 1-0

[Event "Bosna SuperGM"]
[Site "Sarajevo BIH"]
[Date "2000.??.??"]
[White "Morozevich,A"]
[Black "Sokolov,I"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "2748"]
[BlackElo "2637"]
[ECO "C34"]
[Round "3"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 Ne7 4. d4 d5 5. Qe2 Ng6 6. h4 dxe4 7. Qxe4+ Qe7
8. Qxe7+ Nxe7 9. Nc3 c6 10. Bc4 Nf5 11. O-O f6 12. Bxf4 Bd6 13. Rae1+ Kd8 14. Nd2 Bxf4
15. Rxf4 Nd6 16. Bd3 Nd7 17. h5 h6 18. Re3 Re8 19. Rg3 Re7 20. Nce4 Ne8 21. c4 Nf8
22. d5 cxd5 23. cxd5 Re5 24. Nc3 Rxh5 25. Re3 Nd6 26. Nf3 Nf7 27. Rfe4 Ne5 28. Nxe5 Rxe5
29. Rxe5 fxe5 30. Rf3 Ke7 31. d6+ Ke8 32. Nb5 Ne6 33. Bg6+ Kd8 34. Rf7 Bd7 35. Bf5 Be8
36. Re7 Nd4 37. Nc7 Bc6 38. Bh3 1-0

Fischer

[Event "?"]
[Site "Chicago sim"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert J "]
[Black "Sandrin Albert "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. Nf3 Qe7 6. Qe2 O-O 7. e5 Bxc3
8. dxc3 Nh5 9. O-O Re8 10. Qe4 c6 11. Qd4 b5 12. Bd3 g6 13. Bxf4 c5 14. Qe3 Nc6
15. Bxb5 Bb7 16. Rae1 d5 17. exd6 Qf6 18. Qxe8+ Rxe8 19. Rxe8+ Kg7 20. Bxc6 Nxf4 21. d7 Ne2+
22. Rxe2 Bxc6 23. Ne5 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Houston"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Smith,George "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C31"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 e4 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. Qe2 Nxd5 6. Qxe4+ Be6 7. f5 Nxc3
8. bxc3 Qd5 9. Bd3 Qxe4+ 10. Bxe4 Bc8 11. Nf3 Bd6 12. d4 Nd7 13. c4 Nf6 14. Bd3 c6
15. O-O O-O 16. Re1 b6 17. a4 Bb4 18. Bd2 a5 19. Rab1 Bxd2 20. Nxd2 Rb8 21. c5 Nd5
22. Nc4 Ba6 23. Nxb6 Bxd3 24. Nxd5 Rxb1 25. Rxb1 Bxc2 26. Ne7+ Kh8 27. Ra1 Be4 28. Re1 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Houston"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Cunningham,T "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nc6 6. Nf3 Nxd5 7. Nxd5 g5
8. d4 Bg7 9. h4 g4 10. Ne5 Nxe5 11. dxe5 Bxe5 12. Bxf4 Qd6 13. O-O Bxf4 14. Rxf4 h5
15. Qd4 Rf8 16. Rf6 Be6 17. c4 c6 18. Rd1 cxd5 19. cxd5 Ke7 20. e5 Qb6 21. Qxb6 axb6
22. dxe6 fxe6 23. Rxf8 Rxf8 24. Rd6 Rf5 25. Rxb6 Rxe5 26. Rxb7+ Kd6 27. Kf2 Rd5 28. a4 Rd2+
29. Kg3 Rd3+ 30. Kf4 Rd4+ 31. Kg5 Rxa4 32. Kxh5 e5 33. b4 Kc6 34. Rb8 Kc7 35. Re8 Kd6
36. Kxg4 Rxb4+ 37. Kg5 e4 38. h5 Rb5+ 39. Kg6 Kd5 40. h6 Rb6+ 41. Kg5 Rb2 42. g4 Rb7
43. Kg6 Rb6+ 44. Kh5 Rb3 45. h7 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Chicago sim"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert J "]
[Black "Mott_Smith K "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C34"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 g5 5. Bc4 h6 6. O-O Bg7 7. c3 Ne7
8. g3 Ng6 9. Qb3 O-O 10. gxf4 gxf4 11. Kh1 Nc6 12. Qc2 Nce7 13. Nbd2 Be6 14. Rg1 Bxc4
15. Nxc4 d5 16. Nce5 dxe4 17. Qxe4 Qd5 18. Qxd5 Nxd5 19. Nxg6 fxg6 20. Rxg6 Kh7 21. Rg2 Rae8
22. Bd2 Ne3 23. Re2 Nc4 24. Rae1 Rxe2 25. Rxe2 Nxd2 26. Nxd2 Rf6 27. Nf3 Bf8 28. Re8 a5
29. b3 Bd6 30. c4 b6 31. Kg2 Kg6 32. Kf2 Kf5 33. h3 Rf8 34. Nh4+ Kg5 35. Rxf8 Bxf8
36. Ng2 Bg7 37. d5 Be5 38. Kf3 Kf5 39. Ne1 Bc3 40. Nd3 Be5 41. a3 Bd6 42. b4 axb4
43. axb4 Be7 44. c5 bxc5 45. bxc5 Bg5 46. Nb4 Be7 47. Na6 Ke5 48. d6 cxd6 49. c6 Bd8
50. c7 Bxc7 51. Nxc7 d5 52. Na6 Kf5 53. Nb4 d4 54. Nd3 Kg5 55. Nxf4 Kh4 56. Kg2 h5
57. Kh2 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Detroit simul"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert "]
[Black "Witeczek "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C36"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. Bb5+ c6 6. dxc6 Nxc6 7. d4 Bd6
8. O-O O-O 9. Bxc6 bxc6 10. Ne5 Bxe5 11. dxe5 Qb6+ 12. Kh1 Nd5 13. Qe2 Ba6 14. c4 Qd4
15. Na3 Rfe8 16. Qf2 Qxf2 17. Rxf2 Rxe5 18. Bd2 Nb6 19. Bxf4 Re4 20. b3 Bb7 21. Rd1 a5
22. h3 Re7 23. Rfd2 f6 24. Bd6 Rd7 25. Bc5 Rad8 26. Rxd7 Rxd7 27. Rxd7 Nxd7 28. Bd6 Ne5
29. Bc7 Nd3 30. Bxa5 Nc1 31. Bd2 Nxa2 32. Kg1 Kf7 33. Kf2 Ke6 34. b4 Kd6 35. g3 Bc8
36. h4 Bf5 37. Ke3 Ke5 38. b5 cxb5 39. Nxb5 Be6 40. c5 Bd7 41. Nd4 Kd5 42. c6 Bc8
43. c7 Kc5 44. Ne2 Kb6 45. Nf4 Kxc7 46. Nh5 Bg4 47. Nxg7 Kd8 48. Kf4 Bd7 49. Nf5 Ke8
50. Nd4 Kf7 51. Ke4 Kg6 52. Kd5 Be8 53. Ke6 Bf7+ 54. Ke7 Bd5 55. Ne6 Bc4 56. Nf8+ Kg7
57. h5 Bb3 58. h6+ Kg8 59. Nd7 f5 60. Nf6+ Kh8 61. Kf8 Be6 62. Nd5 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Toledo,OH simul"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,R "]
[Black "Underhill,R "]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. fxe5 d6 5. d4 Bb6 6. exd6 Qxd6 7. c3 Bg4
8. Bd3 O-O-O 9. Be3 Ne5 10. Be2 Bxf3 11. gxf3 f6 12. Nd2 Qe7 13. Qb3 g5 14. O-O-O Nh6
15. Nc4 Nxc4 16. Bxc4 Kb8 17. Kb1 Nf5 18. Bc1 Nh4 19. Rhg1 f5 20. exf5 Nxf5 21. Rge1 Qg7
22. Rg1 h6 23. Bd3 Rhf8 24. Qc2 Nh4 25. f4 g4 26. Qf2 Nf5 27. Rde1 h5 28. Re5 Nxd4
29. Rxh5 Nf3 30. Qxf3 gxf3 31. Rxg7 Rxd3 0-1

[Event "?"]
[Site "Toledo simul"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Underhill,Roger "]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. fxe5 d6 5. d4 Bb6 6. exd6 Qxd6 7. c3 Bg4
8. Bd3 O-O-O 9. Be3 Ne5 10. Be2 Bxf3 11. gxf3 f6 12. Nd2 Qe7 13. Qb3 g5 14. O-O-O Nh6
15. Nc4 Nxc4 16. Bxc4 Kb8 17. Kb1 Nf5 18. Bc1 Nh4 19. Rhf1 f5 20. exf5 Nxf5 21. Rfe1 Qg7
22. Rg1 h6 23. Bd3 Rhf8 24. Qc2 Nh4 25. f4 g4 26. Qf2 Nf5 27. Rde1 h5 28. Re5 Nxd4
29. Rxh5 Nf3 30. Qxf3 gxf3 31. Rxg7 Rxd3 0-1

[Event "?"]
[Site "New York"]
[Date "1963.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Evans,Larry M "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "2"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 d6 5. Nc3 Be6 6. Qe2 c6 7. Nf3 Qe7
8. d4 Bxc4 9. Qxc4 g5 10. e5 d5 11. Qd3 Na6 12. Ne2 Nb4 13. Qd1 O-O-O 14. c3 Na6
15. h4 g4 16. Nh2 h5 17. Nxf4 Qxh4 18. Kg1 Nh6 19. Nf1 Qe7 20. Nxh5 Rg8 21. Nfg3 Rg6
22. Nf4 Rg5 23. Be3 Nc7 24. Qd2 Rg8 25. Nfe2 f6 26. exf6 Qxf6 27. Bxh6 Bd6 28. Rf1 Qe6
29. Bf4 Rde8 30. Rh6 Bxf4 31. Qxf4 Qe7 32. Rf6 Ne6 33. Qe5 Ng5 34. Qxe7 Rxe7 35. Rf8+ Rxf8
36. Rxf8+ 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "San Francisco"]
[Date "1963.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Burger,Robert "]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. exd5 Nf6 5. d4 Nxd5 6. Nf3 Be7 7. O-O Be6
8. Bxd5 Bxd5 9. Bxf4 O-O 10. Nc3 c5 11. Nxd5 Qxd5 12. dxc5 Qxc5+ 13. Kh1 Nc6 14. c3 Rad8
15. Qe2 Bd6 1/2-1/2

[Event "?"]
[Site "Cambridge"]
[Date "1977.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert "]
[Black "COMP Greenblatt "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O Nxd5
8. Nxd5 Bd6 9. d4 g5 10. Nxg5 Qxg5 11. e5 Bh3 12. Rf2 Bxe5 13. dxe5 c6 14. Bxf4 Qg7
15. Nf6+ Kh8 16. Qh5 Rd8 17. Qxh3 Na6 18. Rf3 Qg6 19. Rc1 Kg7 20. Rg3 Rh8 21. Qh6+ 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Cambridge, Massachusetts"]
[Date "1977.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert J "]
[Black "Greenblatt Programm "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O Nxd5
8. Nxd5 Bd6 9. d4 g5 10. Nxg5 Qxg5 11. e5 Bh3 12. Rf2 Bxe5 13. dxe5 c6 14. Bxf4 Qg7
15. Nf6+ Kh8 16. Qh5 Rd8 17. Qxh3 Na6 18. Rf3 Qg6 19. Rc1 Kg7 20. Rg3 Rh8 21. Qh6+ 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Buenos Aires"]
[Date "1971.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Szmetan,Jorge "]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C31"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. Nf3 dxe4 4. Nxe5 Nd7 5. Nc3 Ngf6 6. Bc4 Nxe5 7. fxe5 Qd4
8. Bxf7+ Kxf7 9. exf6 Bc5 10. Qe2 gxf6 11. Rf1 h5 12. b3 e3 13. Qc4+ Qxc4 14. bxc4 exd2+
15. Bxd2 Re8+ 16. Kd1 Bg4+ 17. Kc1 Ba3+ 18. Kb1 Rad8 19. Nd5 Re6 20. Bc1 Be2 21. Re1 Bc5
22. a4 Bxc4 23. Rxe6 Kxe6 24. Nxc7+ Kf5 25. a5 Rd7 26. Ra4 Bf7 27. Nb5 Rd1 28. Kb2 Be8
29. Rc4 Bg1 30. Nc3 Rd4 31. Rc7 Bc6 32. Ne2 Rb4+ 33. Kc3 Rb1 34. Nxg1 Rxc1 35. Ne2 Rb1
36. Nd4+ Ke5 37. Nxc6+ Kd6 38. Rf7 Kxc6 39. Rxf6+ Kc7 40. Rf5 h4 41. h3 Ra1 42. Rg5 Kc6
43. Kc4 Ra2 44. Kb3 Ra1 45. Rg6+ Kb5 46. Rg5+ Ka6 47. Rg4 Rb1+ 48. Kc4 Kxa5 49. Kc3 Rg1
50. Rg7 Kb6 51. Kc4 Rc1 52. Rg6+ Ka5 53. Kd3 Kb5 54. Rg4 a5 55. Rxh4 a4 56. Kc3 a3
57. Rb4+ Kc5 58. Ra4 Rg1 59. Rxa3 Rxg2 60. Kb2 Rh2 61. Rc3+ Kb5 62. Kb3 Rh1 63. Rg3 b6
64. Rg5+ Ka6 65. Rh5 Rb1+ 66. Kc3 Rh1 67. Rh8 Kb5 68. h4 Rh3+ 69. Kd4 Kb4 70. h5 Rh4+
71. Ke5 Kc3 72. h6 Kxc2 73. Kf6 b5 74. Kg5 Rh1 75. Rb8 Rg1+ 76. Kf5 Rh1 77. Kg6 Rg1+
78. Kf7 Rh1 79. Kg7 Rg1+ 80. Kh8 Rg5 81. h7 Kc3 82. Rc8+ Kd4 83. Rg8 Rh5 84. Rg4+ Kc3
1/2-1/2

[Event "?"]
[Site "Vinkovci"]
[Date "1968.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Minic,Dragoljub "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "6"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Ne7 4. Nc3 c6 5. Nf3 d5 6. Bb3 dxe4 7. Nxe4 Nd5
8. Qe2 Be7 9. c4 Nc7 10. d4 O-O 11. Bxf4 Ne6 12. Be3 Bb4+ 13. Kf2 Nd7 14. c5 Nf6
15. Nxf6+ Qxf6 16. Rhf1 Nf4 17. Bxf4 Qxf4 18. g3 Qh6 19. Kg1 Bh3 20. Ne5 Bxf1 21. Rxf1 Bd2
22. Rf3 Rad8 23. Nxf7 Rxf7 24. Qe7 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Vinkovci"]
[Date "1968.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Wade,Robert "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "1"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Nf6 3. fxe5 Nxe4 4. Nf3 Ng5 5. d4 Nxf3+ 6. Qxf3 Qh4+ 7. Qf2 Qxf2+
8. Kxf2 Nc6 9. c3 d6 10. exd6 Bxd6 11. Nd2 Be6 12. Ne4 Be7 13. Ng5 Bxg5 14. Bxg5 h6
15. Bh4 g5 16. Bg3 O-O-O 17. Bb5 f5 18. Bxc6 bxc6 19. Be5 Rhg8 20. h4 g4 21. h5 g3+
22. Bxg3 Rg4 23. Rh4 Rdg8 24. Rxg4 Rxg4 25. Re1 Kd7 26. Re5 f4 27. Bh2 Rh4 28. Bg1 Bd5
29. g3 Rg4 30. Bh2 f3 31. b3 a6 32. c4 Rxd4 33. cxd5 Rd2+ 34. Kxf3 Rxh2 35. dxc6+ Kxc6
36. Re6+ Kd7 37. Rxh6 Rxa2 38. Rg6 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Detroit"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Jones,J "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 f6 3. fxe5 Nc6 4. d4 Be7 5. exf6 gxf6 6. Qh5+ Kf8 7. Bc4 Qe8
8. Bh6+ 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Houston"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Staight,G "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 Bc5 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. fxe5 Nxe4 5. d4 Bb6 6. Bd3 Nc5 7. dxc5 Bxc5
8. Nc3 d6 9. Qe2 O-O 10. Be3 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Cicero sim"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer Robert J "]
[Black "Nyman W "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C33"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 d5 4. Bxd5 Nf6 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. Nf3 O-O 7. O-O Bxc3
8. dxc3 c6 9. Bc4 Qb6+ 10. Kh1 Nxe4 11. Qe1 Re8 12. Bxf4 Nd6 13. Bxd6 Rxe1 14. Raxe1 Bd7
15. Ng5 Na6 16. Rxf7 1-0

[Event "?"]
[Site "Houston"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[White "Fischer,Robert J "]
[Black "Michalopoulos "]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C30"]
[Round "?"]

1. e4 e5 2. f4 f5 3. exf5 d6 4. Qh5+ Kd7 5. fxe5 dxe5 6. Nf3 Qf6 7. Nc3 Ne7
8. Ne4 Qxf5 9. Nxe5+ Ke6 10. Bc4+ Kxe5 11. d4...