Originally posted by tonytiger41The Reti.
Interesting remark.
21st century championship-level chess means avoiding machine-enhanced analysis & preparation. The Catalan is an ideal choice for long term strategic advantages and avoidance of 'attacking the king' lines.
Can anyone identify other openings fitting the description ?
Hi
When I did:
http://www.chessedinburgh.co.uk/chandlerarticle.php?ChandID=395
I had nobody on RHP in mind but some of you have read it and adopted
the characters. I'm flattered.
I've played over game 2 on a board.
You have to do this to get the 'feel'.
I'm not sure if this is the positional masterpiece people are claiming it to be.
Anand's Queen swap idea reminds me of some of Lasker's games where
he would accept a weakness for piece activity.
He certainly gets this and an iron grip on e5.
But it kinda 'feels' wrong and Topo's play was so lack lustre.
I kept saccing the e-pawn to get the Bishops going.
Good or bad it was better than getting sqished,
When an imaginative player has an off day he really looks awful.
Topo had one idea. An exchange sac on d3 which Anand saw (27.Bf3 and 39.Rb3)
coming days ago.
This was Topolov's turn to get caught in the headlights like a rabbit.
India is countering the Bulgarian Gravity Death Ray with Lack Lustre Gas
and Anand is wearing nose plugs.
If Anand's match plan is to take 'risks' to keep the initiative from falling
into Topo's hands then we are in for some exciting chess.
Topo is going to need to take 'risks' to steal it back.
Oh and by the way. Morphy was not a 'duck-dodge-and mate' player.
Originally posted by greenpawn34
Oh and by the way. Morphy was not a 'duck-dodge-and mate' player.
Why does everything have to be so arbitrary with you? I didn't mean anything bad and I do not proclaim to be the chess wizard that you are. I apologize for not proclaiming Morphy's ability correctly. I admit I have a lot to learn.
Eric
Originally posted by ChessPraxisProvisional World Chess Rankings (Live Rating)
Does anyone know how the ratings have changed?
I've been checking the live ratings lately, and seen that the WCC games do have a significant effect on the players rating and the overall ranking. With the top 5 being so close the WCC could tip the live ranking order.
A) Top 5 according to FIDE March list:
01 Carlsen: 2813
02 TOPALOV: 2805
03 Kramnik: 2790
04 ANAND: 2787
05 Aronian: 2782
Top 5 live rating before WCC:
01 Carlsen: 2813,0
02 TOPALOV: 2812,2 (+7,2)
03 ANAND: 2791,2 (+4,2)
04 Kramnik: 2790
05 Aronian: 2783,2 (+1,2)
Top 5 live rating after Game 1:
01 TOPALOV: 2816,9 (+4,7)
02 Carlsen: 2813,0
03 Kramnik: 2790,0
04 ANAND: 2786,5 (-4,7)
05 Aronian: 2783,2
Top 5 live rating after Game 2:
01 Carlsen: 2813,0
02 TOPALOV: 2811,5 (-5,4)
03 ANAND: 2791,9 (+5,4)
04 Kramnik: 2790,0
05 Aronian: 2783,2
(The live list at http://chess.liverating.org/ is not out yet, so I used http://ratings.fide.com/calculator_rtd.phtml for the above list).
So Carlsen is back in the lead with Topalov (1,5 points behind) and Anand (21,1 points behind) trailing). If Topalov wins the third game then he gains 4,7 points and the top spot. If he draws or loses, then Anand wins 0,3 and 5,3 points (hope i got the numbers right).
A bit annoying for Anand that even though he is a favorite to win the match he is not likely to sneak past Topalov (or Carlsen) on the rating list.
regards, Paul
Originally posted by pulernThank you for the update.
Provisional World Chess Rankings (Live Rating)
I've been checking the live ratings lately, and seen that the WCC games do have a significant effect on the players rating and the overall ranking. With the top 5 being so close the WCC could tip the live ranking order.
A) Top 5 according to FIDE March list:
01 Carlsen: 2813
02 TOPALOV: 2805
03 Kram ...[text shortened]... tch he is not likely to sneak past Topalov (or Carlsen) on the rating list.
regards, Paul
Originally posted by peacedogI very much doubt that I have had an original thought since the previous century, but I have long held to the idea that we still run races even after the invention of wheels, we still paint even after the invention of the camera, and we still play chess even after the invention of Fritz because we want to measure ourselves.
That was kinda poetic.
Is it a Leggett quote or did you find it somewhere and pasted it here?
I suppose we should credit Protagoras here, with his "Man is the measure of all things", and I'm just looking at modern applications.
Paul