The Catalan Defense
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.g3 dxc4 5.Bg2 a6
Watch the games live here Now:
http://chessbomb.com/o/2010-wcc/02-Anand_V-Topalov_V/
http://www.chessok.com/broadcast/?key=sofia2010_02.pgn&game=0
http://live.chessdom.com/anand-topalov-2010-g2.html
http://www.anand-topalov.com/en/live.htm
Round 1 result:
Topalov (1) vs. Anand (0)
Originally posted by GatussoI agree, the move to N7f6 looks like Topalov is about to throw the kitchen sink at Anand. That's just my opinion. I'm no great chess player by any stretch of the imagination. It is fun to watch these guys though. Once in a while, I see what they see. LOL 🙂
Well, taking the queen was forced for Topalov, since all other moves are inferior. I really wonder what Vishy has in mind, this endgame looks really comfortable for black...
Nigel Short, commentating, has just said:
"I am speechless. 15. Qa3 is a shockingly bad move. White has no winning chances whatsoever after this. Black wasn't threatening anything, so why exchange off the queens, ruin your pawn formation and make things easy for Black all at one go? And this dubious decision has come VERY early in the game"
Originally posted by atticus2I can't really disagree with that. but. short is the king of bad moves. every time I watch him play he seems to do something that's horrible even to my patzer eye. then every single time he tries to fix the problem with duplicating the famous king walk, which never works. 🙂
Nigel Short, commentating, has just said:
"I am speechless. 15. Qa3 is a shockingly bad move. White has no winning chances whatsoever after this. Black wasn't threatening anything, so why exchange off the queens, ruin your pawn formation and make things easy for Black all at one go? And this dubious decision has come VERY early in the game"
at this point I'm still quite certain anand's point will materialize soon. I mean what are the odds that anand, an order of magnitude better player than short, swaps black's cramped queen, a pawn down, gets ugly pawns, and all this after yesterday's catastrophe? slim to none.
Originally posted by atticus2Anand isn't really the "pull it out of your hat" type either is he? I mean, we aren't missing some Morphy-like strategory are we? I just didn't think that was Anand's style. I really don't know? This is just my perception? I thought Anand was a more conservative player though? Not likely to have some Morphy-like "duck-dodge-mate".
Nigel Short, commentating, has just said:
"I am speechless. 15. Qa3 is a shockingly bad move. White has no winning chances whatsoever after this. Black wasn't threatening anything, so why exchange off the queens, ruin your pawn formation and make things easy for Black all at one go? And this dubious decision has come VERY early in the game"
Nigel Short continues to row swiftly backwards: 😀
"This impetuosity - premature what-not - is a characteristic of Topalov's. When attacking it is usally a great strength because he plays with great dynamism. However there are occasions, like today, when one needs to be more cautious, so psychologically Anand has done well here, even though I have been less than impressed with the exact implementation of this strategy"
