Go back
Help with Modern Chess Openings please

Help with Modern Chess Openings please

Only Chess

H

NLR, AR

Joined
05 May 03
Moves
1252
Clock
07 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

I bought MCO-14 tonight and I am having some troubles reading the tables. (The book didn't come with instructions, how rude!) I searched the forums, but I couldn't find a similar question.

I figured out that the rows are move numbers and the columns give game variations. What I don't understand is when columns are connected by dots or nothing at all. Take pg144 for example. (I used the bishop's opening in one of my games and didn't even know it.) I see that column 1 has black's response to 2. Bc4 as Nf6, but what about column 2? Is blacks response still Nf6 or is it Bc5 from column 6? Also, in column 4 has 3. d4 as white's move, but column 5 is devoid of any notation at all. Is the column 5 variation the same as column 4 until 7...c6?

At least that's how I figured out how to read the thing. Thanks for helping a beginner.
tony

V

Joined
31 Mar 03
Moves
358
Clock
07 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think I can help. Basically, the dots mean that either move is considered playable in that position. For example, 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3
d6 ... e6 ... Nc6. All of which are playable lines. Granted, the book doesn't branch out so soon usually, but that is just an example. Hopefully, that was helpful.

kirksey957
Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
Clock
17 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hexagram13
I bought MCO-14 tonight and I am having some troubles reading the tables. (The book didn't come with instructions, how rude!) I searched the forums, but I couldn't find a similar question.

I figured out that the rows are move numbers and the columns give game variations. What I don't understand is when columns are connected by dots or nothing at all ...[text shortened]...
At least that's how I figured out how to read the thing. Thanks for helping a beginner.
tony
Yes, who writes these books? I have the same problem and I think it's the same issue with doctors whose perscriptions you can't read. Arrogance. 🙁😠 Kirk

S
Its MY country

Canada

Joined
07 Jun 02
Moves
1629
Clock
17 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

hehehe..beleive it or not,MCO is one the easier books to understand,format wise.

w

Joined
06 May 03
Moves
1126
Clock
18 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi all 😉

Is MCO the BOOK ?

Coz I am now playing only one or two openings for white, and one or two openings for black.

I wonder if I should continue and proceed on to use MCO and vary my openings regularly...

Anyone can save me from groping in the dark ? Thanks a lot 🙂

Regards,
whitedisc

t

Joined
19 Aug 02
Moves
103327
Clock
19 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whitedisc
Hi all 😉

Is MCO the BOOK ?

Coz I am now playing only one or two openings for white, and one or two openings for black.

I wonder if I should continue and proceed on to use MCO and vary my openings regularly...

Anyone can save me from groping in the dark ? Thanks a lot 🙂

Regards,
whitedisc
I have had a copy of MCO for a while, i have learnt a couple of openings. But now i also use it for a reference when some one makes a move that i do not expect in the first couple of moves.

-trekkie

k

Joined
23 May 03
Moves
3868
Clock
25 May 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

Why bother with a MCO or ECO when you can use something like Chessbase. You can get a lot more statsitacal info with a good Database. There are even free database programs out on the internet.

SicilianDragon

Joined
10 Jun 03
Moves
19229
Clock
12 Jun 03
Vote Up
Vote Down

MCO is reliable and readable. The columns are clearly marked, you just have to take a little time to become oriented. ChessBase should be banned, as well as computers from competitive chess, it takes the enjoyment out of the sport. 😀

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.