20 Jul '15 00:34>
Originally posted by greenpawn34I think the top players all use your formula- especially Carlsen, who often does not seem to care about an advantage of the opening, and instead simply aims to play better chess and win in the end.
Hi Paul,
That must an OTB database. After 2.Nf3 is White playing the 4.b4 line.
or are some chickening out with 3.exd5.
1. e4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. e5 c5 4. b4
[fen]rnbqkbnr/pp3ppp/4p3/2ppP3/1P6/5N2/P1PP1PPP/RNBQKB1R b KQkq - 0 4[/fen]
On here after 4.b4 it's 55% wins v 34% losses from 220 games.
(on here if I get this far I have 100% - ).
...[text shortened]... ked a win.... infact when I
think about it, I am probably losing after 4.b4! in all the games.)
I am not good enough to offer a mathematical proof, but it seems to me that any variation, when played in a sufficient number of games, tend to favor white in the range of 54-56%.
When the percentage is above or below those numbers, the number of games is usually much smaller than normal, which implies that either white or black tend to avoid repeating the path.
A winning line only needs one crushing innovation to relegate it to the trash heap, which ends the use of the variation but preserves its (very misleading) winning percentage, as no new games are played to change it.
One time I was at a class with GM Lars Bo Hansen, and he mentioned that he pays almost no attention at all to the win/loss percentages for openings, because there are so many ways that a game can be lost that are irrelevant to the opening. He was talking about OTB play mainly, but it has influenced my thinking and playing here on the site in the last year or so.