18 Sep '08 19:37>
Originally posted by AudioRaptureFor clarity, the site is refusing to change the rules [one quoted thread is two years old!]. However, the statement you made, "If you can't manage to win in the time you have, it's your own fault", just affirms the bad policy that the site has in place.
I am not refusing a rule change.
The result is possible under present rules here; if you don't like it petition to the site operator(s) to have the rules changed.
Simple as that.
At the 2 blitz sites I have played at, there are numerous bad sports who try to make you lose on time when they are down to a bare king.
Ask the site operators there ...[text shortened]... laying those types in the future.
I know blitz != CC, it was just an illustrative example.
When a site has knowingly left such a policy in place for years, the players can no longer be blamed for taking advantage of it. After all, to compete fairly in a tournament or other event, I need the same opportunity to score points as my opponents have. If they are allowed to win with a bare King, then so must I.
Those who feel slighted by losing to a bare king, if they follow your advice, have only the recourse of skipping all tournaments with 'offending' players in them. Small consolation for those who paid $$ so they could enter the tourneys in the first place.
In general, across all forms of chess, players who feel cheated by poorly conceived rules and/or bad sports have another recourse besides the one you mentioned: They can switch to a site like ICC that has better rules in place.