19 Dec 05
Originally posted by exigentskyIf I were you, I would check to see if you are correct. Chess literature sometimes has flaws, but I have discovered that some of the flaws I find are often rebutted when I truly look deeply into the tactical situation. Sometimes, a position of complexity can have surprises, and you should make sure you are correct (for instance get a computer prog like Fritz to analyze the position) and then and only then mail a correction to the publisher. And, yeah, look at the publisher's address in the book. This is Dear Abby signing off. LOL
Hi,
I found a big tactical omission in the above book and I want to report the error to the authors. Any ideas as how I could contact them?
19 Dec 05
Originally posted by powershakerIt's also usually a good idea to read more than one post of a thread.
If I were you, I would check to see if you are correct. Chess literature sometimes has flaws, but I have discovered that some of the flaws I find are often rebutted when I truly look deeply into the tactical situation. Sometimes, a position of complexity can have surprises, and you should make sure you are correct (for instance get a computer prog like ...[text shortened]... r. And, yeah, look at the publisher's address in the book. This is Dear Abby signing off. LOL