13 Dec '10 04:48>
Originally posted by wormwoodI think this analogy is important.
yeah, exactly. if you'll take every position from the book, and work on them on a board until you know them inside out, it'll be 100% guaranteed beneficial.
the problem is NOBODY does that. nobody. if you'll study one single book thoroughly like that, you've done more work than 99.99% of us. we just get more and more books, and hardly even read them more ...[text shortened]... ting to be able to play jimi hendrix songs just because you've listened to them from a cd.
I spent a couple years learning guitar as a kid, didn't learn songs, just focused on scales, chords and music theory. After that time, I can listen to a song, and if I can remember how the song goes in my head, I can play it.
Chess is the same. If you spend a couple years of hard work on learning how pieces harmonize with each other, tactics, etc. Then you can look at a gm game and things will make sense to you.
Books are primarily for enjoyment or a poor substitute for a coach.
If I could only have one book I would probably choose "Think like a grandmaster" by kotov. He touches on subjects you need to master to be a strong player, but makes it clear that it comes down to the work you put into it- not any secrets..