Go back
In Italian Game, why is Na5 better then Nxd4

In Italian Game, why is Na5 better then Nxd4

Only Chess

H
Renouned Grob Killer

Joined
17 Dec 05
Moves
14725
Clock
08 Jan 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just trying to get some ideas.

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
Clock
08 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HomerJSimpson
Just trying to get some ideas.
To get rid of the bishop

NL

Joined
07 Nov 04
Moves
18861
Clock
08 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's by no means certain that it is. (I assume you're referring to the Two Knights line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 or Nd4)

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
08 Jan 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Northern Lad
It's by no means certain that it is. (I assume you're referring to the Two Knights line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 or Nd4)
If that is the case and it is the Two Knights I think Nd4 (Fritz Variation) is better than Na5! As long as he follows up with ...b5

H
Renouned Grob Killer

Joined
17 Dec 05
Moves
14725
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Northern Lad
It's by no means certain that it is. (I assume you're referring to the Two Knights line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 or Nd4)
then why do all the GMs play it?

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HomerJSimpson
then why do all the GMs play it?
They don't. Here is one example:

[Event "69th ch-BUL"]
[Site "Pleven BUL"]
[Date "2005.??.??"]
[White "Ninov,N"]
[Black "Cheparinov,I"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "2486"]
[BlackElo "2621"]
[ECO "C57"]
[Round "1"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 4. Ng5 d5 5. exd5 Nd4 6. c3 b5 7. Bf1 Nxd5 8. cxd4 Qxg5 9. Nc3 exd4 10. Bxb5+ Kd8 11. Bc6 Nf4 12. Bxa8 Nxg2+ 13. Kf1 Bh3 14. d3 Nf4+ 15. Ke1 dxc3 16. bxc3 Bc5 17. d4 Re8+ 18. Kd2 Nd5+ 19. f4 Qg2+ 20. Kd3 Qe4+ 21. Kc4 Nb6+ 22. Kxc5 Qe7+ 23. Kb5 Bd7+ 24. Ka6 Qd6 25. Qb3 Nxa8+ 26. Ka5 Bc8 27. c4 Re6 28. Qb5 Nb6 29. f5 Nxc4+ 30. Qxc4 Qb6+ 31. Ka4 Bd7+ 32. Ka3 Qa5+ 33. Kb2 Rb6+ 34. Qb3 Ba4 35. f6 Bxb3 36. axb3 Qd5 37. fxg7 Qxb3+ 0-1

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HomerJSimpson
then why do all the GMs play it?
Like the marshall attack, black gives up a pawn for a powerful initiative. A Class A club member drew a master with it at a tournaments in Vegas last year. Tis easier to attack than defend.

s

Kuala Lumpur

Joined
22 Dec 07
Moves
54
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Sometimes Black plays something like Na5 in the Ruy, not overly bent on trading the horsie for the priest, though Black would like it if White doesn't mind, but has the expansion of the queenside in mind.

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by searchingforkolisch
Sometimes Black plays something like Na5 in the Ruy, not overly bent on trading the horsie for the priest, though Black would like it if White doesn't mind, but has the expansion of the queenside in mind.
Nice...we're not talking about the Ruy though.

s

Kuala Lumpur

Joined
22 Dec 07
Moves
54
Clock
09 Jan 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's the same move just in case so we don't have another thread asking why Na5 in the Ruy. =]

H
Renouned Grob Killer

Joined
17 Dec 05
Moves
14725
Clock
09 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I just played this opening recently

Game 4451147

and for the life of me I dont see how this is a good play for black, yes you seem to get an initiative but white has no weaknesses and black loses not only a pawn but destroys his entire pawn structure.

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
09 Mar 08

Originally posted by HomerJSimpson
I just played this opening recently

Game 4451147

and for the life of me I dont see how this is a good play for black, yes you seem to get an initiative but white has no weaknesses and black loses not only a pawn but destroys his entire pawn structure.
The entire setup for black is based on development advantage and initiative to compensate for the pawn. After white's unusual 13.Bd2 (the standard play is b3 and Bb2), you lost the initiative with Nc4, almost 'forcing' white to play the good move Bc3. You should have simply castled. If he played Bc3 anyway, then Ne4 or Nd5 would be good continuations, keeping the initiative for black.

You did resign a bit prematurely in my opinion. You could have castled long and fight for a draw. There were plenty of opportunities to follow for either player to make weaker moves.

Having said all that, it must be added that in today's masterchess, this 5. ... Na5 line has not been very successful for black. And if you are a tactically inclined player, I would also recommend to look deeper into the 5. ... Nd4 line, of which I gave a rather recent GM-game above.

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
09 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
The entire setup for black is based on development advantage and initiative to compensate for the pawn. After white's unusual 13.Bd2 (the standard play is b3 and Bb2), you lost the initiative with Nc4, almost 'forcing' white to play the good move Bc3. You should have simply castled. If he played Bc3 anyway, then Ne4 or Nd5 would be good continuations, kee ...[text shortened]... mend to look deeper into the 5. ... Nd4 line, of which I gave a rather recent GM-game above.
In my opinion 13.Bd2 was dubious choice. Agree that 13..0-0 was much better as after 14.Bc3 Ne4 black has better position.

H
Renouned Grob Killer

Joined
17 Dec 05
Moves
14725
Clock
09 Mar 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
The entire setup for black is based on development advantage and initiative to compensate for the pawn. After white's unusual 13.Bd2 (the standard play is b3 and Bb2), you lost the initiative with Nc4, almost 'forcing' white to play the good move Bc3. You should have simply castled. If he played Bc3 anyway, then Ne4 or Nd5 would be good continuations, kee mend to look deeper into the 5. ... Nd4 line, of which I gave a rather recent GM-game above.
Thanks mephisto! Yeah it seems I went wrong at nc4, I will give nd4 a try

B

Joined
05 Dec 07
Moves
979
Clock
10 Mar 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the fried liver attack..
after 5...Nxd5 this is a fun tactical opening to play although some say it isn't sound... 6.Bxf7+ Kxf7 7.Qf3+ Ke6 8.Nc3 (and more or less continuing to attack the knight on d5 while drawing the king to the middle of the board. It's fun 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.