Go back
Interesting Gambit

Interesting Gambit

Only Chess

c
Grammar Nazi

Auschwitz

Joined
03 Apr 06
Moves
44348
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

I was playing at a weekend tourney a few days ago, and came across an interesting gambit. I had never seen it before, and was quickly crushed. What is it called, and what is a good defense against it? It goes something like this:

1.e4.....e5
2.d4.....exd4
3.c3.....dxc3
4.Bc4...cxb2
5.Bxb2

Resulting in this position:

g
NSB

Ohio

Joined
08 May 06
Moves
30640
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

g
NSB

Ohio

Joined
08 May 06
Moves
30640
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

brah dat Danish opening, stay playing bb5+ dummby quick and castle an you coo

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by clandarkfire
I was playing at a weekend tourney a few days ago, and came across an interesting gambit. I had never seen it before, and was quickly crushed. What is it called, and what is a good defense against it? It goes something like this:

1.e4.....e5
2.d4.....exd4
3.c3.....dxc3
4.Bc4...cxb2
5.Bxb2

Resulting in this position:
[fen]rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/8/2B1P3/8/PB3PPP/RN1QK1NR[/fen]
yeah, that is the danish gambit, i believe there is a way to all but refute it, look how a computer with a good book defends it (obviously dont do this if you have a GIP!)

n
The Ever Living

Third Earth

Joined
17 Feb 07
Moves
35053
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

There is no direct refutation but Black can get easy equality by playing 1.e5 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 d5!

p

Joined
23 Sep 07
Moves
23415
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

blacks next viable moves are d6 or Qe7, although d5 seems to be the most preferred move. You then Enter the Danish Gambit Schlechter Defense variation.
Who remembers these names I do not know.

Looking at the whole opening from the book, it seems very long and I don't understand the latter half.

davaniel
1.Nf3

The Hague

Joined
13 Feb 05
Moves
82376
Clock
20 Feb 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by clandarkfire
I was playing at a weekend tourney a few days ago, and came across an interesting gambit. I had never seen it before, and was quickly crushed. What is it called, and what is a good defense against it? It goes something like this:

1.e4.....e5
2.d4.....exd4
3.c3.....dxc3
4.Bc4...cxb2
5.Bxb2

Resulting in this position:
[fen]rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/8/2B1P3/8/PB3PPP/RN1QK1NR[/fen]
The Danish gambit is a risky opening, and as najdorfslayer said it is easy to get equality after c3 d5!. I played it a couple of times when I started playing at the site, and if your opponent doesn't know how to defend against it, he is very likely to be crushed. However, if he does know how, the two pawns down become quite a lot...

MA

Joined
02 Apr 07
Moves
2911
Clock
23 Feb 08
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by clandarkfire
I was playing at a weekend tourney a few days ago, and came across an interesting gambit. I had never seen it before, and was quickly crushed. What is it called, and what is a good defense against it? It goes something like this:

1.e4.....e5
2.d4.....exd4
3.c3.....dxc3
4.Bc4...cxb2
5.Bxb2

Resulting in this position:
[fen]rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/8/2B1P3/8/PB3PPP/RN1QK1NR[/fen]
The standard book continuation is:

5...d5 6. Bxd5 Nf6 7. Bxf7+ Kxf7 8. Qxd8 Bb4 9. Qd2 Bxd2 10. Nxd2

Note that Black has had to give up the extra material he won in order to survive and defend, but he has equalized. Gambits which are sound usually have ways to win back the material. The point of the gambit is to trade material for piece development and time, to gain the initiative and an attack. The defender then has to understand, first, that he must give up the won material, and second, when to do so to best effect. That generally seems to be the key to accepting gambits: knowing when to give back material.

Edit: For example, in the sequence above, 5....Nf6 fails to 6.e5 (among other things); whereas after 5...d5 the bishop is blocked and then lured onto d5 (capturing the pawn), so that after 6.Bxd5 Nf6 the knight is attacking the bishop and 7.e5 is ruled out.

Edit: in the sequence given above, 6...Bb4+ might be worth a look also.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.