Interesting mate in 4

A lot of times in the forums people ask about ways to use a chess computer to improve their game. Here is my way:

1. Set the computer on a really easy level (for you), where you can really get a good position, maybe get ahead in material.

2. Play until you get the feeling there is a possible mate in there, trust yourself here.

3. When you get that vibe turn on the analysis without looking at the suggested moves, just waiting for the magic words "Mate in ..." Sometimes you get a mate in 13 or something ridiculous, I usually ignore these unless its obvious and forced and keep playing my own moves until it gets down to at least Mate in 4.

4. Turn the analysis back off (NO PEEKING) and you have just generated yourself a brand new chess problem to solve. Remember to look for all the possible mates in 4 (or 3 or 2 or 1 whatever you like) sometimes the obvious way through gets blocked!

Here is an easy one from today's silly game. White to move

Originally posted by Exuma
A lot of times in the forums people ask about ways to use a chess computer to improve their game. Here is my way:

1. Set the computer on a really easy level (for you), where you can really get a good position, maybe get ahead in material.

2. Play until you get the feeling there is a possible mate in there, trust yourself here.

3. When you get that 's silly game. White to move

[fen]1r4rk/1P2Q1bp/p4Bp1/5p2/2BP4/2P5/P4PPP/R3K1NR w [/fen]

Reveal Hidden Content

Uries and Pawn of Prophecy both with a correct answer. Note that the white Queen could be pinned to the king along the open e-file....

Here is another one - white to move, mate in 4 - 2 possible first moves

Hi Exuma

I like the idea of dumbing down a box to make it playable to beef up your tactics.

But am a wee bit worried about getting it to give you a hint when the mate is on.

The 'vibe' as you call it, (I call it by various names, 'the stinger', 'the twinge'.)
Is a very important part of chess development. Very important.

I see you too find it hard to describe. It's impossible to explain to those
players who have yet to experience it.

It is the moment when you know there is 'something on'.
A mate, a threat, a trap.... And now is the time to dig in and see what
your inner eye has told you.

Stronger players have this down to an art. It's been established that stronger
players actually analyse less in a game than weaker players because they know
(the vibe) when the postion demands their full attention
Weaker players jump into the think tank at all the wrong times.

Best I'm thinking is once you have 'the vibe' is to look first.
And I mean really look. Give the postion a good going over till you
find what the twinge was all about.

If you see nothing then play on.
After the game use the box to see if it can explain it.

Your way, in my opinion, does not nuture the vibe.
You are doubting yourself (trust the twinge...always trust the twinge) and
getting a huge hint without doing the work and building up your board confidence.

Just a thought.

That makes a lot of sense, GP. I wonder if I should instate a "no CPU analysis month" and see if doing my post-mortems manually increases my understanding.

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Hi Exuma

I like the idea of dumbing down a box to make it playable to beef up your tactics.

But am a wee bit worried about getting it to give you a hint when the mate is on.

The 'vibe' as you call it, (I call it by various names, 'the stinger', 'the twinge'.)
Is a very important part of chess development. Very important.

I see you too find ...[text shortened]... nt without doing the work and building up your board confidence.

Just a thought.

"Stronger players have this down to an art. It's been established that stronger
players actually analyse less in a game than weaker players because they know
(the vibe) when the postion demands their full attention
Weaker players jump into the think tank at all the wrong times."

Fritz, Chessmaster, Shredder all have a difficulty setting. I don't know about Rybka etc. I have an old version of chessmaster and it has "personalities" some of which are pretty "dumb". Greenpawn is right though, once mate is threatened the computer plays the move which will make the mate take the most moves, as opposed to playing moves which are hard to figure, or have a threat that you must deal with before you can go through with the mate. When you play a computer there will always be moves it makes that will take you forever to figure the why, and its not necessarily good even if you do - some number crunched position that doesn't contain *ideas*...
Still I have some fun blitzing against the easy opponents in chessmaster especially when too tired to look at my RHP games, or CUI 🙂 (chess under the influence)

Originally posted by Randall Starr
Exuma, I'm sorry if this has been answered 100x, but what/where are the computer opponents to which you refer? I imagine you're not playing Big Blue, and I'd love the steady practice - maybe try speed games. Where do I find computer opponents and are they free programs or website downloads? Again, I'm sorry if this has been asked over and over. thx!

Just post them Mad Rook and stop trying to boost your PM hits 😉

When bored I like Grommit. It plays OK (nearly humanish) and
has a 3 move horizon so you set up combo's 4 moves deep. Good practise.

This is a finish from a game I played recently against it.

White has the old 1-2-3-4 mate. I played my Knight to f4 to set it up.
Nice pattern this well worth knowing.



White to play. Try it. (it's done with checks).

Soultion follows

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Just post them Mad Rook and stop trying to boost your PM hits 😉