1. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    09 Feb '09 23:29
    I guess I haven't posted in a while. I'm on kind of a semi-vacation from chess. 🙂

    Here is an interesting position that I came across.



    Before I give anything away, I'll just leave this up for a while.

    It is white to move right now.
  2. Standard memberDiet Coke
    Forum Vampire
    Sidmouth, Uk
    Joined
    13 Nov '06
    Moves
    45871
    09 Feb '09 23:33
    Well the first thought would be

    1. Rf8+ Kxf8 2. gxh7 Ra4+ 3 Kg5 and white Queens next move.
  3. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6830
    09 Feb '09 23:48
    Yes, that looks simple enough. I wonder what Black's last move was?
  4. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    10 Feb '09 00:08
    Lasker actually played 1.Rf8+ Kxf8 2.gxh7, leading to the following position:



    Black to move
  5. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    10 Feb '09 00:17
    Originally posted by Diet Coke
    Well the first thought would be

    1. Rf8+ Kxf8 2. gxh7 Ra4+ 3 Kg5 and white Queens next move.
    I can't find a way to refute 3...Rh4! yet. It looks winning for black.
  6. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    10 Feb '09 00:23
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    I can't find a way to refute 3...Rh4! yet. It looks winning for black.
    You didn't fall into the trap (although my second diagram with black to move may have been a good hint 🙂 ).

    After 2. ... Ra4+, it doesn't matter where the king goes !!!

    3. ... Rh4 4.Kxh4 g5+ !!

    Black's a pawn queens, and white's h pawn doesn't !!!

    This is from the simul Lasker-Loman 1913.

    Even the great ones can fall into a nice deep trap. 🙂
  7. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    10 Feb '09 00:251 edit
    Let me change that a bit.

    This position is "adapted" from the simul Lasker-Loman.

    According to chessgames.com, the actual game was played in 1903 and had more pawns on the board.

    http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1267162

    The "adapted" position is from an old issue of Chess Life Magazine.
  8. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    10 Feb '09 00:26
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    You didn't fall into the trap (although my second diagram with black to move may have been a good hint 🙂 ).

    After 2. ... Ra4+, it doesn't matter where the king goes !!!

    3. ... Rh4 4.Kxh4 g5+ !!

    Black's a pawn queens, and white's h pawn doesn't !!!

    This is from the simul Lasker-Loman 1913.

    Even the great ones can fall into a nice deep trap. 🙂
    I suppose if Kramnik can get mated in one by Fritz, then anything is possible, although this case is far more understandable, since it was a simul.
  9. Joined
    24 Aug '07
    Moves
    48477
    10 Feb '09 00:29
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    Let me change that a bit.

    This position is "adapted" from the simul Lasker-Loman.

    According to chessgames.com, the actual game was played in 1903 and had more pawns on the board.

    http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1267162

    The "adapted" position is from an old issue of Chess Life Magazine.
    I wondered why the position looked more like a chess problem.

    They took a few pawns off the board. 🙂
  10. Standard memberDiet Coke
    Forum Vampire
    Sidmouth, Uk
    Joined
    13 Nov '06
    Moves
    45871
    10 Feb '09 00:59
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    You didn't fall into the trap (although my second diagram with black to move may have been a good hint 🙂 ).

    After 2. ... Ra4+, it doesn't matter where the king goes !!!

    3. ... Rh4 4.Kxh4 g5+ !!

    Black's a pawn queens, and white's h pawn doesn't !!!

    This is from the simul Lasker-Loman 1913.

    Even the great ones can fall into a nice deep trap. 🙂
    At least I went down with Good company. 🙂
  11. Account suspended
    Joined
    28 Mar '07
    Moves
    5104
    10 Feb '09 08:04
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    I guess I haven't posted in a while. I'm on kind of a semi-vacation from chess. 🙂

    Here is an interesting position that I came across.

    [fen]6k1/6pp/6P1/p7/6K1/8/5RPP/r7[/fen]

    Before I give anything away, I'll just leave this up for a while.

    It is white to move right now.
    I did not play that!
  12. Joined
    25 Apr '06
    Moves
    5939
    10 Feb '09 08:191 edit
    Originally posted by Diet Coke
    Well the first thought would be

    1. Rf8+ Kxf8 2. gxh7 Ra4+ 3 Kg5 Rh4 0-1
    Funny that you give the exactly correct losing line. There are some twins of this idea too - but this is the most well-known version I believe.
  13. Joined
    29 May '08
    Moves
    10250
    10 Feb '09 12:38
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    I guess I haven't posted in a while. I'm on kind of a semi-vacation from chess. 🙂

    Here is an interesting position that I came across.

    [fen]6k1/6pp/6P1/p7/6K1/8/5RPP/r7[/fen]

    Before I give anything away, I'll just leave this up for a while.

    It is white to move right now.
    This position is drawn. There are no tricks (Rf8+??), and after a bunch of pawn trades we will reach a drawn position (KR vs. KR, or KP vs. K w/o opposition).
  14. Joined
    21 Feb '06
    Moves
    6830
    10 Feb '09 16:18
    I should have known there was more to this position than the obvious Rf8+, which any experienced player would have seen in 0.5 seconds.

    The game that the position is based on, plus a few other examples, can be found here:
    http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess/prok.htm
  15. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    10 Feb '09 17:09
    Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
    Lasker actually played 1.Rf8+ Kxf8 2.gxh7, leading to the following position:

    [fen]5k2/6pP/8/p7/6K1/8/6PP/r7[/fen]

    Black to move
    ..Ra4+, Kg5 ..Rh4!! Kxh4 ..g5+, Kxg5 ..Kg7 0-1
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree