Go back
Interesting Queen Sac

Interesting Queen Sac

Only Chess

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I just played two three minute games on FICS.

I played a really nice queen sac in this one.



I played 25.Qxf7+ !!!

The best part is it works !!!

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Here is the game ( 3 minute game).




24.c3 ! was better

25.R1e4 was actually better. Then after 25. ... Nd4 26.Qxf7+ works.

28.Ne5 was better.

Simply 31.Rd8 was also much better.

It's pretty much a time scramble from that point on.

I did win on time. 🙂

Clock
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

NVM, scratch that 😀.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

It's astonishing that you can calculate so deeply in a 3 minute game, bravo on the move.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LordofADown
It's astonishing that you can calculate so deeply in a 3 minute game, bravo on the move.
Thanks

It's a little calculation and a lot intuition.

I have actually been in a kind of rut at 3 0 lately.

I got up to 2070 or so a few weeks ago and then began to fall apart.

I started hanging my queen and all sorts of nasties (mainly from playing too many hours in a row).

The funny thing is that one minute chess is my best game.

I am only 30 points shy of 2200 !!!

🙂

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Game 5648391

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by schakuhr
Game 5648391
D'OH 🙂

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't know whether anyone will find this game interesting or not.

It is against my friends phone with Chess Genius.

We had it set on a weak level (1 Second A Move).

We used a real chess set. (He made the moves like he was playing white.)

I didn't spend all that much time on it. In the endgame, I played especially (too) fast.



I mentioned during the game that I made a serious error in the opening. I should never have allowed the inactive bishop to get to c2 and trade it off for my active f5 knight.

11. ... b5 (11. ... a5) and 12. ... a5 followed by 13. ... a4 should have stopped this maneuver.

My 17. ... gxf5 was inspired by a Korch blog !!! I thought 17. ... exf5 woud be terrible. The position is just begging for e6 by white. I don't know if 18.e6 works, but it is a constant pain. I know this isn't exactly the same, but in Korch's Lasker vs Nimzowitsch blog he mentions Nimzowitsch sacking the h pawn for time and play rather than concrete compensation. Thanks Korch. 🙂

20.Rd2 was puzzling. I guess it was worried about me playing Qc2.

23. ... Rg8 just looked bad to me. I thought white could just march the h pawn and cause me severe pain.
Look at how bad my position is after 23. ... Rh7. My rook is completely out of play, and my king is stuck in the center.
I am still in shock that I was able to draw this against a computer.
Luckily, my counterplay came just in the nick of time.

28. ... Ra3 was better.

33. ... Qa6 has a cute point. I will show it in a fen after I post this.

44.b4 was a classic computer move. 🙂

45. ... e5 46.b5 ! (The point of b4)

The remainder of the ending is me playing terribly but luckily reaching a drawn ending.

I did blitz the endgame though. 🙂

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down



This is the position after 33.Qf3 Qa6 (instead of 33. ... Qa5).

The game went 33. ... Qa5 34.g3.

33. ... Qa6 34.g3 ??

Clock
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down



Here black wins !!!

34. ... Rxh5 !! 35.Rxh5 ?? And Black Mates !!!

A fun variation that highlights the slightest difference in a single move (Qa5/Qa6).

Someone post the mate. 🙂

Clock
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
[fen]8/3k1p1r/q1p1pB2/3pPp1P/1b1P4/1P3QP1/5P2/3K3R[/fen]

Here black wins !!!

34. ... Rxh5 !! 35.Rxh5 ?? And Black Mates !!!

A fun variation that highlights the slightest difference in a single move (Qa5/Qa6).

Someone post the mate. 🙂
35. ... Qa1+!

If 36. Kc2, then 36. ... Qa2+ 37. Kc1 (37. Kd1 or Kd3, Qd2# ) Qd2+ 38. Kb1 Ba3 and mates next move unless white sacs the queen, which staves off mate for a couple of moves, but that's it

If 36. Ke2, then 36. ... Qe1+ Kd3 37. Qd2#



One question though: What's wrong with 35. Qxh5 ?
edit: NM, 35. Qxh5 leads to Qe3+ and forced mate

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, im not too sure about the soundness of the sac if it led to a b and N vs R situation; but in a three minute game, it forces your opponent to burn up and time and increases the chance of them making a misake. Well done.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
35. ... Qa1+!

If 36. Kc2, then 36. ... Qa2+ 37. Kc1 (37. Kd1 or Kd3, Qd2# ) Qd2+ 38. Kb1 Ba3 and mates next move unless white sacs the queen, which staves off mate for a couple of moves, but that's it

If 36. Ke2, then 36. ... Qe1+ Kd3 37. Qd2#



One question though: What's wrong with 35. Qxh5 ?
edit: NM, 35. Qxh5 leads to Qe3+ and forced mate
I know you meant 35.Qxh5 Qd3+


Very Well Done !!!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
I just played two three minute games on FICS.

I played a really nice queen sac in this one.

[fen]3q1rk1/p2PRpbp/1p4p1/2p5/P1N3P1/5Q2/1Pn2P1P/4R1K1 [/fen]

I played 25.Qxf7+ !!!

The best part is it works !!!
Very nice move, especially in 3 min. However, I would not call that a queen sac, more of a rook or piece sac to me, you get the queen back by force in 2 moves, but you sac a piece for a longer period of time.

Still, very nice game!

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromfics
I know you meant 35.Qxh5 Qd3+


Very Well Done !!!
Thank you.

And, yes, e, d, whatever. Same basic idea. 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.