22 May '09 04:13>2 edits
I thought this was a pretty good post tournament interview. I like how Nakamura talks, very intelligent, easy going, and down to earth. However, he talks about how pro players really can't be in it "for the money" and there has to be a love for the game involved since it's very hard to make a good living playing chess. But then when asked if he plays for the love of the game he replies that he can't really say he's totally in love with chess. This principle is why I believe America has trouble producing another World Champion. When Fischer was interviewed during his run for the World title he always mentioned never taking his sight off the title and not resting until it's attained. He was relentless in study and preparation, and I think did truly love the game, but his drive for the title was, IMO, what made him great. Kasparov talks about his relentless study, preparation, and analysis of even won games and that is why he dominated for years. Karpov always said he wanted to be the best. I just don't see any Americans who really have this kind of drive, and therefore I just don't see any American world champions in the foreseeable future. Of course, this can be argued with Capablanca, and maybe even Anand (about chess not being their life).
Oh yea, here''s the link to the interview :-)
http://main.uschess.org/content/view/9400/529/
Oh yea, here''s the link to the interview :-)
http://main.uschess.org/content/view/9400/529/