08 Oct '13 14:16>1 edit
http://www.chessvibes.com/breaking-kasparov-announces-candidacy-for-fide-president
Kasparov runs for FIDE president, but this time he has the backing of an Oil Shake (Sheikh Mohammed bin Ahmed Al Hamed) with unlimited funds! For those who haven't paid attention to previous elections, it has been widely 'suspected' that reining president, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, has managed to buy the presidency by giving backhanders to electors from tiny countries. When Karpov ran last elections (with Kasparov as his second), there was much discussion about small islands getting an equal vote with huge countries like Russia. It appears that this time round, Kasparov has learned that it's a rigged game!
I am interested to know what people think about his candidacy? Personally, i'm not convinced he would make a good leader. The man is a great chess player, but he is such a combative personality. When the World championship was split up in the 90's, it really did nothing for the sport. Yes FIDE was in a terrible state at the time and there were a lot of mitigating circumstances that i don't really want to go into as they're a point in history. But Kasparov was the main reason obstacle to a reunification of the two titles.
Don't get me wrong, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov is a nut bag I would be happy to see the back of him. But Kasparov as his replacement? Not so sure..
Kasparov runs for FIDE president, but this time he has the backing of an Oil Shake (Sheikh Mohammed bin Ahmed Al Hamed) with unlimited funds! For those who haven't paid attention to previous elections, it has been widely 'suspected' that reining president, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, has managed to buy the presidency by giving backhanders to electors from tiny countries. When Karpov ran last elections (with Kasparov as his second), there was much discussion about small islands getting an equal vote with huge countries like Russia. It appears that this time round, Kasparov has learned that it's a rigged game!
I am interested to know what people think about his candidacy? Personally, i'm not convinced he would make a good leader. The man is a great chess player, but he is such a combative personality. When the World championship was split up in the 90's, it really did nothing for the sport. Yes FIDE was in a terrible state at the time and there were a lot of mitigating circumstances that i don't really want to go into as they're a point in history. But Kasparov was the main reason obstacle to a reunification of the two titles.
Don't get me wrong, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov is a nut bag I would be happy to see the back of him. But Kasparov as his replacement? Not so sure..