Originally posted by RabbitCold Do these books cover 3 Bc4 instead of Nc3?
yes, and next to the Bc4, the authors will have surely written at least three pages worth of laughter...
Nf3 is great because it develops one of the pieces which could eventually attack f7...
the bishop almost always goes to c4 anyway...
but by allowing the queen to check to h4 and you have to move the king to f1...
it's just ugly...
Originally posted by rubberjaw30 yes, and next to the Bc4, the authors will have surely written at least three pages worth of laughter...
Nf3 is great because it develops one of the pieces which could eventually attack f7...
the bishop almost always goes to c4 anyway...
but by allowing the queen to check to h4 and you have to move the king to f1...
it's just ugly...
I'd have to disagree, when they go Qh4+ against me they usually lose their queen or their king 🙂 rather quickly. like under 20 moves.
Originally posted by rubberjaw30 yes, and next to the Bc4, the authors will have surely written at least three pages worth of laughter...
Nf3 is great because it develops one of the pieces which could eventually attack f7...
the bishop almost always goes to c4 anyway...
but by allowing the queen to check to h4 and you have to move the king to f1...
it's just ugly...
Reading the first page on Amazon, the author actually recommends bc4. To me it looks like with bc4 and qh4 black loses a tempo, and white loses castling rights.
Doesn't look especially advantageous for white. I must be missing something?
I've played the Kings Gambit for years you have to bring it to your opponent with tactical power. If your afraid of a little risk don't play this gambit.