Go back
Kings Indian variation

Kings Indian variation

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have been studing chess openings for black, by Lev Alburt, Roman Dzindzichashvill and Eugene Perelshteyn anyway the line goes 1.Nf3 c5 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.0-0 Nc6 5.d3 Nf6 6.e4 how should i continue?If you have a better line to seggest please say so, thanks alot

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormer
I have been studing chess openings for black, by Lev Alburt, Roman Dzindzichashvill and Eugene Perelshteyn anyway the line goes 1.Nf3 c5 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.0-0 Nc6 5.d3 Nf6 6.e4 how should i continue?If you have a better line to seggest please say so, thanks alot
Why didn't you just post this in the already existing KI thread....?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

just didn't think about it

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormer
I have been studing chess openings for black, by Lev Alburt, Roman Dzindzichashvill and Eugene Perelshteyn anyway the line goes 1.Nf3 c5 2.g3 g6 3.Bg2 Bg7 4.0-0 Nc6 5.d3 Nf6 6.e4 how should i continue?If you have a better line to seggest please say so, thanks alot
If someone plays 1. Nf3 I wouldn't reply with c5 because you are likely to get a strange version of a Sicilian. Others may like that sort of thing but I don't. My own personal choice would be to mirror white's moves for a while and see what happens or play d5 and see if white has the balls to play a proper Reti.

Vote Up
Vote Down

either a type of closed sicilian or english opening but with d5 or Nf6 you are likey to get a queens gambit, collie system etc... there are more but i don't want to waste time naming them

Vote Up
Vote Down

what would happen with 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.b4

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormer
what would happen with 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.b4
If play continued 2. ... g6 3. c4 then you have reached a variation often played by Reti against KID-style play. It was also used by Smyslov and Stein apparently. Apart from that, I don't know. This is not something I have ever played myself and have never had it played against me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
If play continued 2. ... g6 3. c4 then you have reached a variation often played by Reti against KID-style play. It was also used by Smyslov and Stein apparently. Apart from that, I don't know. This is not something I have ever played myself and have never had it played against me.
OTB I played this lines, as White, half a dozen times last year ... with universally awful results.

(I'm switching for 2008!)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kepler
My own personal choice would be to mirror white's moves for a while and see what happens or play d5 and see if white has the balls to play a proper Reti.
Is 1. Nf3 d5, 2. c4 a particularly ballsy approach for White? I play it frequently myself although I suspect 2. d4 is objectively a better move.

Back to the original post ...

If you want a KID against 1. Nf3 why not,

1. Nf3 Nf6, 2. c4 g6

you can always play ... c5 later on if you want to.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by JonathanB of London
Is 1. Nf3 d5, 2. c4 a particularly ballsy approach for White? I play it frequently myself although I suspect 2. d4 is objectively a better move.
That is allegedly the Reti as it should be played - anythings other than 1. Nf3 d5 2. c4 is apparently something else. I like the Reti but most other people seem to dislike the positions they get. I suppose people just don't like the impression that black is suddenly in control. Illusion of course, but I think it does take a bit of courage to play a real Reti.