15 Aug 07
What is your preferred variation for beating the kings indian, and why? I have experimented with transpositions from the english where I have c4, d4, Nc3, g3, Bg2 and delay (possibly for the entire game) the e4 advance.
Now that I play 1. d4 instead of 1. c4 I have tried the Saemisch and classical variation, but neither with great success. Should I go back to what I'm most comfortable with, are there more options, or are these two variations worth further consideration.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by zebanoI think you should try the four pawns attack. The space advantage can litteraly strangle black on the early stages.
What is your preferred variation for beating the kings indian, and why? I have experimented with transpositions from the english where I have c4, d4, Nc3, g3, Bg2 and delay (possibly for the entire game) the e4 advance.
Now that I play 1. d4 instead of 1. c4 I have tried the Saemisch and classical variation, but neither with great success. Should I go ba ...[text shortened]... fortable with, are there more options, or are these two variations worth further consideration.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by zebanoBayonet attack! 9.b4 in The Classical KID
What is your preferred variation for beating the kings indian, and why? I have experimented with transpositions from the english where I have c4, d4, Nc3, g3, Bg2 and delay (possibly for the entire game) the e4 advance.
Now that I play 1. d4 instead of 1. c4 I have tried the Saemisch and classical variation, but neither with great success. Should I go ba ...[text shortened]... fortable with, are there more options, or are these two variations worth further consideration.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by Korchhmm
What about Petrosian system?
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessopening?eco=E93 that looks like what I thought of as the classical. Bad luck with that after black easily dumps a knight onto c5 and plays a5 to hold it.
I will have to look into the bayonett attack.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by RegicidalI looked at that once. Someone had an interesting comment...
My preferred variation against the classical kid is the 9.Ne1 line with a4, a5 to follow.
"All mortals not named Karpov have a problem with such moves". Anyway, the game was interesting so I suppose I will have to try it out.
Between that, the bayonett and a further look at the fianchetto variation does it have a name? I should be able to come up with something I am comfortable with.
15 Aug 07
Originally posted by zebanoI don't know of a name. Anyway, what I like about it is that it's solid and dangerous for black. Black looks like he's getting a big kingside attack but it's difficult to coordinate correctly, while white's queenside initiative is straightforward.
I looked at that once. Someone had an interesting comment...
"All mortals not named Karpov have a problem with such moves". Anyway, the game was interesting so I suppose I will have to try it out.
Between that, the bayonett and a further look at the fianchetto variation does it have a name? I should be able to come up with something I am comfortable with.
I like Kiriakov's treatment in particular and in my two games I mostly follow Kiriakov.
Game 3639066
Game 3000530