30 Jun '10 19:05>2 edits
In my "famous moves" thread someone nominated this Levitsky-Marshall game for the notorious 23.... Qg3!!
Of all of the suggested moves that's the one that struck me as the most shocking. So I did a quick Google searched and learned that game was dubbed the "American Beauty" and there's quite a bit of hoopla about it in the chess world.
But then I ran across this posting of the game:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094915
In the comments section 'ORBIT' kind of downplays the significance of the Queen move, pointing to other games a player has planted his Queen along a row of pawns. One of the ones he pointed out was Nicolas Rossolimo vs Paul Reissmann in 1967, and this time the move really does force mate. In the "American Beauty" it does not.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1260578
I'm very far away from being a connoisseur of historic chess games, but it seems to me he made some good points. So for the seasoned "historians" of chess games, what made the the Queen move in the Levitsky-Marshal game so noteworthy?
Of all of the suggested moves that's the one that struck me as the most shocking. So I did a quick Google searched and learned that game was dubbed the "American Beauty" and there's quite a bit of hoopla about it in the chess world.
But then I ran across this posting of the game:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1094915
In the comments section 'ORBIT' kind of downplays the significance of the Queen move, pointing to other games a player has planted his Queen along a row of pawns. One of the ones he pointed out was Nicolas Rossolimo vs Paul Reissmann in 1967, and this time the move really does force mate. In the "American Beauty" it does not.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1260578
I'm very far away from being a connoisseur of historic chess games, but it seems to me he made some good points. So for the seasoned "historians" of chess games, what made the the Queen move in the Levitsky-Marshal game so noteworthy?