Go back
Look them straight in the eyes...

Look them straight in the eyes...

Only Chess

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
07 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

...and don't blink!

Anyone else got examples of games where they won because their opponent avoided an exchange?

Game 1818469

S

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6500
Clock
07 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
...and don't blink!

Anyone else got examples of games where they won because their opponent avoided an exchange?

Game 1818469
Only yesterday on FICS I lost one because of that....

if I went hunting i could find thousands..,

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
15 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

*large bump*

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
15 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
...and don't blink!

Anyone else got examples of games where they won because their opponent avoided an exchange?

Game 1818469
The real reason your opponent lost is because he failed to look one move ahead. Ariel Mengarini's sage advice is so often neglected: "Avoid blunders! Avoid blunders! Drum it into your head. No move without a next-ply search!".

s

Joined
12 Feb 05
Moves
47202
Clock
15 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
...and don't blink!

Anyone else got examples of games where they won because their opponent avoided an exchange?

Game 1818469
A bit similar in the end to your own game:

Game 1810323

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
15 Apr 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
The real reason your opponent lost is because he failed to look one move ahead. Ariel Mengarini's sage advice is so often neglected: "Avoid blunders! Avoid blunders! Drum it into your head. No move without a next-ply search!".
Well, duh. It's a blunder by definition. It was the KIND of blunder I was interested in.

And I might add it was a calculated move on my part because I thought my opponent was the type of player who WOULD avoid an exchange.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
15 Apr 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
Well, duh. It's a blunder by definition. It was the KIND of blunder I was interested in.

And I might add it was a calculated move on my part because I thought my opponent was the type of player who WOULD avoid an exchange.
What's the point of showing people overlooking a one-move checkmate? You dress it up in some kind of showy title like "Avoiding an exchange and losing", as if you were offering something remotely interesting or educational on that particular topic.

This example is about as interesting:


White to move

Black is just one of those players that doesn't like to trade pieces! Knowing that, White plays the brilliant 1.b6!!! knowing that Black will play 1...a5 to avoid the trade, allowing a clear win after 2.b7!!

J

back in business

Joined
25 Aug 04
Moves
1264
Clock
16 Apr 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

[Event "OTB 30m+30m"]
[Site "Finland"]
[Date "2005"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Jusuh"]
[Black "1600-rated"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Bc4 h6 5. O-O Bc5 6. c3 dxc3 7. Bxf7+ Kf8
8. Nxc3 Qe7 9. Bxg8 Rxg8 10. Nd5 Qd8 11. Be3 Bd6 12. Bd4 Qe8 13. Re1 Nxd4
14. Qxd4 c5 15. Qc3 b6 16. e5 Qe6 17. exd6 Qxd5 18. Rad1 Qf5 19. Re5 Qg6
20. Nh4 Qg4 21. Rf5+ Ke8 22. Re1+ Kd8 23. h3 Qxh4 24. Qxg7 Re8 25. Rxe8+
Kxe8 26. Rf8#
{White mates} 1-0

clearly, 7...Kf8, avoiding exchange of bishops (7...Kxf7 8.Dd5+) was a blunder.

P

Joined
01 Feb 06
Moves
994
Clock
16 Apr 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
"Avoid blunders! Avoid blunders! Drum it into your head. No move without a next-ply search!".
Game 1852647

wise words. if black had followed that advice he wouldn't have thrown his queen away on move 24 to a knight fork

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
17 Apr 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
What's the point of showing people overlooking a one-move checkmate? You dress it up in some kind of showy title like "Avoiding an exchange and losing", as if you were offering something remotely interesting or educational on that particular topic.

Have a brain. The idea was for people who are better chess players than I to come up with BETTER examples.

Where in the world did you get the idea that I was the teacher, not the student? I'm trying to start a thread because I thought I might learn something from it. Instead of pulling it down, why don't you search through your own brilliant repertoire and post a decent example of an exchange being avoided which costs the game?

o
Paralysed analyst

On a ship of fools

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
25780
Clock
17 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PawnChop
Game 1852647

wise words. if black had followed that advice he wouldn't have thrown his queen away on move 24 to a knight fork
Again, where did you get this idea that I thought I was a good chess player?

P

Joined
01 Feb 06
Moves
994
Clock
17 Apr 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

when you tell us you devised a chess plan based upon the fact you had deciphered your opponents chess style and could predict his moves before he made them.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
17 Apr 06
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orfeo
Have a brain. The idea was for people who are better chess players than I to come up with BETTER examples.

Where in the world did you get the idea that I was the teacher, not the student? I'm trying to start a thread because I thought I might learn something from it. Instead of pulling it down, why don't you search through your own brilliant repertoire and post a decent example of an exchange being avoided which costs the game?
No one is accusing you of being a teacher or a good chess player. The title indicated that you might have unearthed what must be a rare thing in your games: a moment of inspiration.

Upon finding that all there was in the thread was merely a game decided on the crudest of blunders (can't get much worse than a helpmate in 1!), most people politely made no comment. Rather than taking the hint, you bumped the thread.

Anyway, as requested, here is a better example.

BDP-NN
White to play

Hoping to shake up a roughly equal position, I played 1.e6!?. The main point is to win the exchange by exf7+, since Black must do something about his hanging Queen. Black did not wish to play an endgame down the exchange, so he replied 1...f4? and fell victim to my attack: 2.exf7+ Rxf7 3.Bxf7+ Kxf7 4.Rf1 Bd6 5.Qh4, and Black's exposed K did not survive.

Much better would have been 1...Qxg3! 2.exf7+ Rxf7 3.hxg3 and Black has a pawn for the exchange, and White is saddled with two isolated, doubled g-pawns. Black has perfectly good chances.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.