1. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    07 Jan '23 21:261 edit
    Steinitz delusional
    Lasker was well rounded
    Capa was decent...a drinking womanizer
    Alekhine probably a crazy Nazi if they won the war
    Euwe boring
    Botvinnik was also well rounded
    Smyslov seemed normal
    Tal was Tal
    Petrosian I dunno
    Spassky seemed normal
    Fischer crazy as bat shyt
    Karpov normal
    Kasparov was aggressive

    Definitely a variety of temperaments.
  2. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    08 Jan '23 00:09
    Hi Booger

    "Smyslov seemed normal ."

    '...He [Smyslov] seemed to believe in astrology and the prophecies of
    Nostradamus, and was convinced that chess originated on Atlantis. '

    http://britishchessnews.com/2020/04/16/smyslov-on-the-couch/
  3. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    08 Jan '23 00:182 edits
    Hi Booger,

    "Botvinnik was also well rounded"

    Paying someone to blow smoke in his face whilst he studied. Normal?

    And this from Averbach. Botvinnik was paranoid about being poisoned...even by a friend.

    'Once, on Sunday, my wife came to Botvinnik's dacha with a fresh cake from Cafe
    National, which was famous for its sweets back in the day. You should have seen
    how glad were all the guests when they started to eat the cake. But the host didn't
    even touch it. Only during supper, when the cake was placed on the table again,
    Botvinnik did eat some - after he was sure that everyone who ate it at the dinner were all right.'

    https://www.chess.com/blog/Spektrowski/yuri-averbakh-remembers-mikhail-botvinnik
  4. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    08 Jan '23 00:322 edits
    @greenpawn34

    The smoke in the face was training for chess playing halls where smoking was allowed.
    Understandable.

    Also, poisoning during the Soviet Union did happen so it's also understandable to be careful.
  5. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    08 Jan '23 00:45
    Hi Booger,

    Fischer crazy as bat shyt

    Quite a few people were worried about Bobby's mental state when he was young.
    In the late 1950's a meeting was held to discuss how best he be treated.

    "Then someone raised a question: What if therapy worked? What if treatment sapped
    Fischer's drive to win, depriving the United States of its first homegrown world champ?
    Meeting adjourned. No one, Kaufman recalls, wanted to tamper with that finely tuned brain."

    https://psmag.com/social-justice/a-psychological-autopsy-of-bobby-fischer-25959

    So people were concerned, but they left him untreated because they wanted an
    American chess champion...and make money out of him.
    As time went on he got worse. It was not his fault he was mentally ill.
  6. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113541
    08 Jan '23 01:311 edit

    Removed by poster

  7. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113541
    08 Jan '23 01:32
    @booger said
    Steinitz delusional
    Lasker was well rounded
    Capa was decent...a drinking womanizer
    Alekhine probably a crazy Nazi if they won the war
    Euwe boring
    Botvinnik was also well rounded
    Smyslov seemed normal
    Tal was Tal
    Petrosian I dunno
    Spassky seemed normal
    Fischer crazy as bat shyt
    Karpov normal
    Kasparov was aggressive

    Definitely a variety of temperaments.
    First you get on Greenpawn about comparing Carlsen to eccentric players from the past, then in this post you call them "well-rounded". Did you change your mind?
  8. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    08 Jan '23 08:24
    Eccentric players of the past are a lot better than a quitter like Magnus Carlsen and Fischer.

    Not all world champions were nuts and even the ones who were a little off are better than quitters.
  9. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    08 Jan '23 08:253 edits
    @paul-leggett said
    First you get on Greenpawn about comparing Carlsen to eccentric players from the past, then in this post you call them "well-rounded". Did you change your mind?
    No...moonbus said champions are finiky...
    Magnus isn't strange like previous champions.

    He's a quitter like Fischer.

    You can't compare strange behaviour of the past champions to a quitter like Magnus Carlsen just to give him a pass for his behaviour because people are fans of his.

    Is anyone here going to tell me Magnus won't ever enter the candidates cycle ever again?
  10. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    08 Jan '23 12:083 edits
    Hi Booger,

    I was agreeing with you and given you some examples of odd harmless behavior.

    Bobby on the other hand had problems that nobody understood (or ignored).
    Having won the title after being obsessed with it since he was young there was only
    thing that could happen, he was going to lose it, and that was not going to happen.

    Carlsen, who came from a more stable background, is a millionaire. He wants to
    enjoy life without the burden of the title and possibly one day standing on the
    rostrum as the ex-champion. Anand and Kramnik seemed to accept it. Kasparov
    waited a few years then retired when he too was number one on the rating list.
    (also a quitter?)

    I do not think Carlsen will return to the world title cycle. He may take part in some of
    the qualifying events. The World Cup etc but give up his qualifying spot.

    I, like many others am disappointed that Carlsen turned his back 150 of chess history
    and in a way demeaned the title without any valid reason other than he cannot be bothered.
    Comparing him to Fischer is not quite correct. Carlsen willingly retired the title.
    Bobby still called himself the World Champion till the day he died.
  11. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    08 Jan '23 20:14
    @greenpawn34

    The Kasparov PCA fiasco and the years of BS after that would be quitting in my book.

    Magnus is definitely the best ever and tosses the title away making it less.

    We just got over the Kasparov/FIDE battles and now this.

    I'm making it into a big deal because I always considered the world champions as almost godlike.
    Jealousy and envy are definitely part of it. 😉
  12. Standard memberEndLame
    👌
    Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Nov '22
    Moves
    5624
    08 Jan '23 22:33
    I also take challenges and title defenses seriously.

    No matter if it's the world championship or a rivalry between friends or siblings.
  13. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12431
    09 Jan '23 10:30
    @booger said
    I also take challenges and title defenses seriously.

    No matter if it's the world championship or a rivalry between friends or siblings.
    Well, there's your problem.

    The Real Guys take the competition seriously, but the love of the game more seriously.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree