Nope. The most important thing in Chess is to avoid big ups and downs in your rating graph.
User 325628
And a big Texas "Howdy" to you. Reverb. Aren't the Bluebonnents beautiful this year?
😉 😀 😛
They are quite nice. Maybe our out-of-state (or out-of-county) friends don't realize that the beautiful bluebonnet flowers along our highways are almost single-handedly attributable to the former first lady Lady Bird Johnson, who saw to it that the highway right-of-ways were seeded for years and years with wonderful wildflowers of all varieties. I wish some of the foreign players I've competed against here could come and visit us in Texas someday.
Originally posted by National Master DaleHeh - way to up the "huh?" factor, every good thread needs that. Here is Barry Schwartz on TED talking about "choice"
I also think that one should try to avoid flexible moves since that kinda accidentally makes folks drift.
Flexibility and useless are almost the same thing.
I realize choice is not quite the same as flexibility. Or uselessness. But could be close 😉
Edit - by the way, the opinions of the shorts wearing speaker do not reflect the opinions of me. Just stirring the pot
Originally posted by National Master DaleSince your profile mentions your Master rating, I would really like to hear your thinking on this if you could expand your remarks, please.
I also think that one should try to avoid flexible moves since that kinda accidentally makes folks drift.
Flexibility and useless are almost the same thing.
Are you saying, "don't play moves that could fit into more than one plan" or something like, "play moves for a specific reason, not on general principles"?
I think of white opening 1Kt-f3 as a flexible move, but certainly far from useless, but you may not have meant opening moves. How about bringing a Rook to the d/e file without a specific target? That is flexible in that it might attack an uncastled King or guard a passed pawn or invade the 7th rank any of which seems useful to me.
Best, Steve