1. Joined
    16 Dec '04
    Moves
    56692
    10 Apr '06 15:42
    White to play and mate in 2:



    This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
  2. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    10 Apr '06 15:452 edits
    Originally posted by TheGambit
    White to play and mate in 2:

    [fen]3r3r/pbp2pbp/1p5q/8/Q6P/B2B1PPN/1R2P1N1/2k1nK1R[/fen]

    This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
    Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
  3. Canberra, Australia
    Joined
    07 Jan '03
    Moves
    19005
    10 Apr '06 16:00
    Originally posted by zebano
    Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
    Kd2
  4. Joined
    05 Oct '05
    Moves
    63425
    10 Apr '06 16:011 edit
    Originally posted by zebano
    Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
    Why not in one move, moving the rook on the left side to the left one space.
    ?

    (okay I see...then take the black bishop with the white bishop.)
    (I REALLY have to learn how to write in that code-speak.)
  5. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    3685
    10 Apr '06 16:042 edits
    Originally posted by zebano
    Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
    Your sequence allows for Kc2, not check mate.
  6. London
    Joined
    28 Sep '04
    Moves
    110329
    10 Apr '06 16:051 edit
    Originally posted by SJ247
    Why not in one move, moving the rook on the left side to the left one space.
    ?
    Because then the queen is not defending the d1 square.
  7. Joined
    05 Oct '05
    Moves
    63425
    10 Apr '06 16:06
    Originally posted by Bishopcrw
    Your sequence allows for Kc2, not check mate.

    Answer is Rb1+, Kd2, Qd1#
    Okay, will you please do me a favor and read my edited post and tell me if I was right? I cannot read the AB1X-bx stuff.
  8. EDMONTON ALBERTA
    Joined
    30 Sep '05
    Moves
    10841
    10 Apr '06 16:071 edit
    Rb1 Kd2, Qc2 Checkmate

    EDIT: Nope, I'm wrong.
  9. Canberra, Australia
    Joined
    07 Jan '03
    Moves
    19005
    10 Apr '06 16:093 edits
    Kxe1, and I cannot see how mate can be avoided the next move.


    Edit: Qc2# and Kf2# being the two threats.
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    3685
    10 Apr '06 16:12
    I though I saw it but did't.

    SJ you are right in your edited post the black bishop and Queen can have interferring Diagonals
  11. Joined
    03 Mar '05
    Moves
    45799
    10 Apr '06 16:13
    Originally posted by TheGambit
    White to play and mate in 2:

    [fen]3r3r/pbp2pbp/1p5q/8/Q6P/B2B1PPN/1R2P1N1/2k1nK1R[/fen]

    This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
    Perhaps:

    1. Qb4 (threatens QxN ++)

    Now if:

    1. ... BxR
    2. QxN ++

    if

    1. ... RxB
    2. Rd2 ++

    or

    1. ... Nc2
    2. Rb1 ++

    or

    1. ... Qd2
    2. Rb1 ++
  12. Canberra, Australia
    Joined
    07 Jan '03
    Moves
    19005
    10 Apr '06 16:19
    Originally posted by CrawlIce
    Perhaps:

    1. Qb4 (threatens QxN ++)

    Now if:

    1. ... BxR
    2. QxN ++

    if

    1. ... RxB
    2. Rd2 ++

    or

    1. ... Nc2
    2. Rb1 ++

    or

    1. ... Qd2
    2. Rb1 ++
    After 1.Qb4 Rxd3 2.Rd2+ Black has Bb2.
  13. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    3685
    10 Apr '06 16:212 edits
    Nice sequences Crawl!
  14. Canberra, Australia
    Joined
    07 Jan '03
    Moves
    19005
    10 Apr '06 16:21
    Originally posted by dyl
    Kxe1, and I cannot see how mate can be avoided the next move.


    Edit: Qc2# and Kf2# being the two threats.
    What about Bc3+? If 2.Kf2+ then Be1, and Rd2+ is met by Bb2. You goose.
  15. EDMONTON ALBERTA
    Joined
    30 Sep '05
    Moves
    10841
    10 Apr '06 16:221 edit
    Ok, got it!

    Rb1+ Kd2, Qd1++

    EDIT: No, no... that doesn't work either, Kc3 🙁
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree