Only Chess Forum
- Joined
- 16 Dec '04
- Moves
- 56692
White to play and mate in 2:
This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
127.0.0.1
- Joined
- 27 Oct '05
- Moves
- 158564
Originally posted by TheGambit
White to play and mate in 2:
[fen]3r3r/pbp2pbp/1p5q/8/Q6P/B2B1PPN/1R2P1N1/2k1nK1R[/fen]
This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
Canberra, Australia
- Joined
- 07 Jan '03
- Moves
- 19005
Originally posted by zebano
Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
Kd2
- Joined
- 05 Oct '05
- Moves
- 63425
Originally posted by zebano
Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
Why not in one move, moving the rook on the left side to the left one space.
?
(okay I see...then take the black bishop with the white bishop.)
(I REALLY have to learn how to write in that code-speak.)
- Joined
- 07 Dec '05
- Moves
- 3685
Originally posted by zebano
Ra2+, Bb2, Bxb2#
Your sequence allows for Kc2, not check mate.
London
- Joined
- 28 Sep '04
- Moves
- 110329
Originally posted by SJ247
Why not in one move, moving the rook on the left side to the left one space.
?
Because then the queen is not defending the d1 square.
- Joined
- 05 Oct '05
- Moves
- 63425
Originally posted by Bishopcrw
Your sequence allows for Kc2, not check mate.
Answer is Rb1+, Kd2, Qd1#
Okay, will you please do me a favor and read my edited post and tell me if I was right? I cannot read the AB1X-bx stuff.
EDMONTON ALBERTA
- Joined
- 30 Sep '05
- Moves
- 10841
Rb1 Kd2, Qc2 Checkmate
EDIT: Nope, I'm wrong.
Canberra, Australia
- Joined
- 07 Jan '03
- Moves
- 19005
Kxe1, and I cannot see how mate can be avoided the next move.
Edit: Qc2# and Kf2# being the two threats.
- Joined
- 07 Dec '05
- Moves
- 3685
I though I saw it but did't.
SJ you are right in your edited post the black bishop and Queen can have interferring Diagonals
- Joined
- 03 Mar '05
- Moves
- 45799
Originally posted by TheGambit
White to play and mate in 2:
[fen]3r3r/pbp2pbp/1p5q/8/Q6P/B2B1PPN/1R2P1N1/2k1nK1R[/fen]
This is from the web so it may have been posted before, if that is the case, apologies!
Perhaps:
1. Qb4 (threatens QxN ++)
Now if:
1. ... BxR
2. QxN ++
if
1. ... RxB
2. Rd2 ++
or
1. ... Nc2
2. Rb1 ++
or
1. ... Qd2
2. Rb1 ++
Canberra, Australia
- Joined
- 07 Jan '03
- Moves
- 19005
Originally posted by CrawlIce
Perhaps:
1. Qb4 (threatens QxN ++)
Now if:
1. ... BxR
2. QxN ++
if
1. ... RxB
2. Rd2 ++
or
1. ... Nc2
2. Rb1 ++
or
1. ... Qd2
2. Rb1 ++
After 1.Qb4 Rxd3 2.Rd2+ Black has Bb2.
- Joined
- 07 Dec '05
- Moves
- 3685
Canberra, Australia
- Joined
- 07 Jan '03
- Moves
- 19005
Originally posted by dyl
Kxe1, and I cannot see how mate can be avoided the next move.
Edit: Qc2# and Kf2# being the two threats.
What about Bc3+? If 2.Kf2+ then Be1, and Rd2+ is met by Bb2. You goose.
EDMONTON ALBERTA
- Joined
- 30 Sep '05
- Moves
- 10841
Ok, got it!
Rb1+ Kd2, Qd1++
EDIT: No, no... that doesn't work either, Kc3 🙁
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree