Go back
Mate in two

Mate in two

Only Chess

i
SelfProclaimedTitler

Joined
06 Feb 06
Moves
23543
Clock
13 May 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

I purchased Pandolfini "Checkmate" tactical book. I started to solve chapter with mates in two, I succesfully solved 20 of them but I stuck on number 21. I do not want to consult fritz, I now he knows the anwser for sure 🙂

Can you find the anwser?! White to play.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
Clock
13 May 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivan2908
I purchased Pandolfini "Checkmate" tactical book. I started to solve chapter with mates in two, I succesfully solved 20 of them but I stuck on number 21. I do not want to consult fritz, I now he knows the anwser for sure 🙂

Can you find the anwser?! White to play.[fen]r1b1qb1r/ppp3k1/2np3p/4P2n/2BP2pB/3Q4/PPP3P1/RN3RK1 w - - 0 1[/fen]
move dark bishop in to f6, nxf6, Pxf6 - mate.

K
Demon Duck

of Doom!

Joined
20 Aug 06
Moves
20099
Clock
13 May 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivan2908
I purchased Pandolfini "Checkmate" tactical book. I started to solve chapter with mates in two, I succesfully solved 20 of them but I stuck on number 21. I do not want to consult fritz, I now he knows the anwser for sure 🙂

Can you find the anwser?! White to play.[fen]r1b1qb1r/ppp3k1/2np3p/4P2n/2BP2pB/3Q4/PPP3P1/RN3RK1 w - - 0 1[/fen]
1. Bf6 is pretty obvious. 1...... Nxf6 2. exf6#

Edit: Words beginning with B, I was too slow.

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
13 May 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivan2908
I purchased Pandolfini "Checkmate" tactical book. I started to solve chapter with mates in two, I succesfully solved 20 of them but I stuck on number 21. I do not want to consult fritz, I now he knows the anwser for sure 🙂

Can you find the anwser?! White to play.[fen]r1b1qb1r/ppp3k1/2np3p/4P2n/2BP2pB/3Q4/PPP3P1/RN3RK1 w - - 0 1[/fen]
If I didn't get it in 15 minutes or so, I'd just look up the answer in the book. The book does have answers, right?

Anyway, I think this works:

1. Bf6+ Nxf6 2. exf6#

One hint is when you see the bishop-queen pair together on the same colored squares with the enemy king between the line of fire of those two pieces.

Edit - Rats, too slow, 2 people beat me to it, lol

h

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
9221
Clock
13 May 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mad Rook
If I didn't get it in 15 minutes or so, I'd just look up the answer in the book. The book does have answers, right?

Anyway, I think this works:

1. Bf6+ Nxf6 2. exf6#

One hint is when you see the bishop-queen pair together on the same colored squares with the enemy king between the line of fire of those two pieces.

Edit - Rats, too slow, 2 people beat me to it, lol
try the demo download of personal chess trainer at personalchesstrainer.com the tactics section has lots like that. You go through many more problems in a small time frame, thus learning faster.

V

Joined
21 Sep 05
Moves
27507
Clock
13 May 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'd add two points...

- although I found the mate in two, it wasn't the first thing I looked at. Moves like Rf6 grabbed my initial attention.

- note that the winning line involves checking twice in a row. We know that checks are forcing moves; and we know that forcing moves need to be considered. So Bf6+ and ef+ should be candidates on that basis alone

h

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
9221
Clock
13 May 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Varenka
I'd add two points...

- although I found the mate in two, it wasn't the first thing I looked at. Moves like Rf6 grabbed my initial attention.

- note that the winning line involves checking twice in a row. We know that checks are forcing moves; and we know that forcing moves need to be considered. So Bf6+ and ef+ should be candidates on that basis alone
If moves aren't forced then you usually can't make the statement of Checkmate in 2 because the opponent then has an opportunity to change things.

V

Joined
21 Sep 05
Moves
27507
Clock
13 May 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hamltnblue
If moves aren't forced then you usually can't make the statement of Checkmate in 2 because the opponent then has an opportunity to change things.
Yes, but I think we're talking about separate things.

When someone initially considers Bf6 - and prior to working out that it forces mate - then they don't know if it's forcing from a mate point of view. But they do know that it is forcing from a check point of view. i.e. I was referring to the role of forcing moves while looking for a mate; not describing the moves for a concluded line

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.