Go back
New banning(s)

New banning(s)

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by English Tal
cludi
do you know if any games of any of the banned will be retracted?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
Nice! That is one less cheat to skank me in the 2008 finals.
I lost to shane once too, and thought he came accross as a bit of a cheat.
I hope you don't mind my asking... but how does one "come across as a bit of a cheat"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I hope you don't mind my asking... but how does one "come across as a bit of a cheat"?
by cheating, of course. next question. i'm the answer man

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I hope you don't mind my asking... but how does one "come across as a bit of a cheat"?
By beating me!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
By beating me!
LOL 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Tyrannosauruschex
By beating me!
hey, that formulas actually really foolproof!
Game 3890914

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
His OTB games at the British were weird. I went over one game which proved to be nineteen or so moves of theory! But some of his blunders / bad decisions were the sort you'd expect a much weaker player to see. I think he just lost his nerve after the first few rounds and was beatable by just about anyone.
true, and losing his nerve probably did happen. but I remember looking at his 2nd(?) game, and screaming wtf aloud on the 23.e3 pawn push which seemed to make absolutely no sense. then I started thinking what am I not getting here. but after a while, no, it still made no sense. 🙂

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
[b]I hope you don't mind my asking... but how does one "come across as a bit of a cheat"?[/b
Game 4000680

Some lovely endgame technique from the Man here. Not many players would have played 40. ... b4 as it looks like White will be able to win Black's queenside pawns, or at least sacrifice his knight for them and get to a drawn ending where Black's bishop doesn't control the queening square for his last remaining (rook) pawn.

Edit: I'm going mad - the bishop does control the queening square!

Vote Up
Vote Down

This user (445874) was banned. He never got above 1700 and did not strike me as super strong. Can one be banned for reasons other than use of an engine?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ParShooter
This user (445874) was banned. He never got above 1700 and did not strike me as super strong. Can one be banned for reasons other than use of an engine?
From the terms of service:

3. YOUR REGISTRATION OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of your use of the Service, you represent that you are of legal age to form a binding contract and are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdiction. You also agree to :

(a) You will not create more than one account.

(b) While a game is in progress you may not refer to chess engines, chess computers or be assisted by a third party. Endgame tablebases may not be consulted during play but you may reference books, databases consisting of previously played games between human players, and other pre-existing research materials.

(c) You may not threaten or harass other users of this Service.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ParShooter
This user (445874) was banned. He never got above 1700 and did not strike me as super strong. Can one be banned for reasons other than use of an engine?
It's a 3a: User 445874 and User 448162.

There seem to be a few more: User 446871 and User 446935

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by English Tal
cludi
Congratulations on the 2007 - at last! 😀

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Fat Lady
Never mind those - seadevil has gone at last! User 51824
I am shocked with "sea devil" banning...."mgbal" involment in cheating was also disappinting. What if any of these two are innocent.?What about there years of hardwork in that case? Can they appeal aganst there banning?

Vote Up
Vote Down

So the Cludi saga is resolved; nine months too late. Better than never I suppose. Good riddance.

Shanenoack was pretty obvious; virtually all of his early games are at beginner's level and then all of a sudden his ability becomes 2200+. Good riddance.

I ran one of SeaDevil's games (I was looking at his opponent who is also a cheat) and his match up with Fritz's first choices was the highest I'd ever seen; 28 of 32. Others ran analyses with other engines in other games and got similar extraordinary results.
Good riddance.

South Sniper was another well known cheat (there are plenty of others). Good riddance.

Kudos to the secret Game Mod team for finding the obvious and to the Site Admins for finally pulling the trigger on some of the more blatant cheats.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
true, and losing his nerve probably did happen. but I remember looking at his 2nd(?) game, and screaming wtf aloud on the 23.e3 pawn push which seemed to make absolutely no sense. then I started thinking what am I not getting here. but after a while, no, it still made no sense. 🙂

[pgn]
[Event "British Championship"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2008.07.29"]
[R ...[text shortened]... 32. Rc3 Kf6 33. f4 e5
34. Rc6+ e6 35. Rc3 e4 36. Ke3 d4+ 0-1
[/pgn]
I don't think a OTB blunder, quite possibly in time trouble and in a lost position, should be considered evidence of cheating here.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.