User 447004
User 307351
User 431792
User 391460
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone and another one gone
Another one bites the dust, eh
Hey, I'm gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust
Originally posted by clandarkfiresweet thanks! took me five minutes to spot inprob after I was set against him in a clan challenge, which can't even be deleted. took 2½ months from the secret santas, but better late than never.
User 447004
User 307351
User 431792
User 391460
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone and another one gone
Another one bites the dust, eh
Hey, I'm gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust
Originally posted by clandarkfirePity! Our club only identified 2 of them (some considerable time ago)
User 447004
User 307351
User 431792
User 391460
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone and another one gone
Another one bites the dust, eh
Hey, I'm gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust
Need to work revise our proceedures to avoid being caught out again.
492 games completed at rhp and a quick count reveals 11 usernames banned for various reasons. It appears that simply numbers of games played is not relevant to the number of banned players one is likely to encounter,rather that random chance plays a bigger part? Only four of the 11 usernames are confirmed as [section 3b]blackbuck-stephane-mary anne ,and walshie,the others being for other reasons. section 3b therefore represents less than 1 percent of total games played and ,if this is typical of other players,it would appear to be not unreasonable?