Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Only Chess Forum

Only Chess Forum

  1. Standard member clandarkfire
    Grammar Nazi
    12 Dec '08 03:54 / 1 edit
    User 447004

    User 307351

    User 431792

    User 391460


    Another one bites the dust
    Another one bites the dust
    And another one gone and another one gone
    Another one bites the dust, eh
    Hey, I'm gonna get you too
    Another one bites the dust
  2. Standard member wormwood
    If Theres Hell Below
    12 Dec '08 04:14 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by clandarkfire
    User 447004

    User 307351

    User 431792

    User 391460


    Another one bites the dust
    Another one bites the dust
    And another one gone and another one gone
    Another one bites the dust, eh
    Hey, I'm gonna get you too
    Another one bites the dust
    sweet thanks! took me five minutes to spot inprob after I was set against him in a clan challenge, which can't even be deleted. took 2½ months from the secret santas, but better late than never.
  3. Subscriber kNIGHTHEAD
    aka DEFIANT
    12 Dec '08 06:11
    where do they post the lastest bannings???
  4. Standard member misterrigel
    Dosadi Survivor
    12 Dec '08 07:48
    Originally posted by kNIGHTHEAD
    where do they post the lastest bannings???
    "They" don't. I don't think we've ever heard why.
  5. Standard member Dragon Fire
    Lord of all beasts
    12 Dec '08 09:06
    Originally posted by clandarkfire
    User 447004

    User 307351

    User 431792

    User 391460


    Another one bites the dust
    Another one bites the dust
    And another one gone and another one gone
    Another one bites the dust, eh
    Hey, I'm gonna get you too
    Another one bites the dust
    Pity! Our club only identified 2 of them (some considerable time ago)

    Need to work revise our proceedures to avoid being caught out again.
  6. Standard member Korch
    Chess Warrior
    12 Dec '08 09:09 / 1 edit
    Interesting is fact that User 447004 was member of clan ruled by ex(?) Game mod.....
  7. 12 Dec '08 10:13
    Isn't this a fight with the WindMills?
  8. 12 Dec '08 10:30
    Originally posted by vipiu
    Isn't this a fight with the WindMills?
    Fighting 3(a) is a fight with the Windmills. Fighting 3(b) is a fight with Ironmen.
  9. Standard member Lundos
    Back to basics
    12 Dec '08 15:45
    Originally posted by Nordlys
    Fighting 3(a) is a fight with the Windmills. Fighting 3(b) is a fight with Ironmen.
    Lulz.
  10. Subscriber Proper Knob
    Cornovii
    12 Dec '08 18:50
    I've played over 700 games, and only 3 players i've played have been banned.
  11. 12 Dec '08 21:02
  12. Standard member peacedog
    Highlander
    12 Dec '08 23:30
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    I've played over 700 games, and only 3 players i've played have been banned.
    Thats good to hear.
  13. Standard member Mctayto
    Highlander
    13 Dec '08 01:14
    This thread won't last long so post away any more you know about before it bites the dust with all threads that name & shame
  14. Standard member RECUVIC
    international loser
    13 Dec '08 02:59
    492 games completed at rhp and a quick count reveals 11 usernames banned for various reasons. It appears that simply numbers of games played is not relevant to the number of banned players one is likely to encounter,rather that random chance plays a bigger part? Only four of the 11 usernames are confirmed as [section 3b]blackbuck-stephane-mary anne ,and walshie,the others being for other reasons. section 3b therefore represents less than 1 percent of total games played and ,if this is typical of other players,it would appear to be not unreasonable?
  15. Standard member randolph
    the walrus
    13 Dec '08 05:10
    Originally posted by RECUVIC
    492 games completed at rhp and a quick count reveals 11 usernames banned for various reasons. It appears that simply numbers of games played is not relevant to the number of banned players one is likely to encounter,rather that random chance plays a bigger part? Only four of the 11 usernames are confirmed as [section 3b]blackbuck-stephane-mary anne ,and wals ...[text shortened]... al games played and ,if this is typical of other players,it would appear to be not unreasonable?
    You're likely to have a result much higher than the norm as your rating inevitably leads to playing more cheaters.