1. Standard memberKorch
    Chess Warrior
    Riga
    Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    24932
    05 Oct '07 21:59
    Originally posted by Mephisto2
    It took you a while this time to fall back to your true nature. Will you apologise or do I ask for a 3.c?
    If you would look at his posts in other threads then you will see that he is ill-mannered with all people who disagree with his opinion.
  2. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    05 Oct '07 22:02

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. London
    Joined
    04 Nov '05
    Moves
    12606
    06 Oct '07 04:43
    The person who places second in the tournament is BETTER than the person who placed first IF he beats him in a match - FACT!
    Surely the "fact" is that one player won the tournament and the other the match.
  4. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    06 Oct '07 05:24
    Originally posted by jvanhine
    i agree, its so simple!

    winner=champ.
    5 minute chess tournament. Winner = champ.

    Simplicity rules!!
  5. Joined
    05 Aug '07
    Moves
    1638
    06 Oct '07 11:21
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Holding your breath till you turn blue, eh? Typical childish behavior.

    Find someone with any knowledge of chess history who thinks that Leko and/or Grischuk are among the top ten players of all time (besides Leko and/or Grischuk's mother). Find someone with any knowledge of chess history who thinks Capablanca and/or Alekhine AREN'T.
    In 1970 Bobby Fischer listed the 10 best players of all time as follows:

    1.Botvinnik
    2.Capablanca
    3.Gligoric
    4.Larsen
    5.Morphy
    6.Petrosian
    7.Reshevsky
    8.Spassky
    9.Steinitz
    10.Tal

    As you can see,no Alekhine.Fischer may be mad but I'm pretty sure he has some knowledge of chess history.
  6. Standard membercludi
    Blogger
    Account suspended
    Joined
    13 Jul '04
    Moves
    52666
    07 Oct '07 11:55
    Originally posted by ouwe belg
    In 1970 Bobby Fischer listed the 10 best players of all time as follows:

    1.Botvinnik
    2.Capablanca
    3.Gligoric
    4.Larsen
    5.Morphy
    6.Petrosian
    7.Reshevsky
    8.Spassky
    9.Steinitz
    10.Tal

    As you can see,no Alekhine.Fischer may be mad but I'm pretty sure he has some knowledge of chess history.
    1970 is of course a long time ago, but still, I'm thrilled to see danish GM Bent Larsen in 4th place on this list.
    It's not at all surprising, though. Bent Larsen was undoubtedly one of the world top 3 GM's in the late 60's/ early 70's.

    He never did well in match play, but he was definitely one of the very best tournament players of all time!
  7. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    07 Oct '07 18:48
    Originally posted by ouwe belg
    In 1970 Bobby Fischer listed the 10 best players of all time as follows:

    1.Botvinnik
    2.Capablanca
    3.Gligoric
    4.Larsen
    5.Morphy
    6.Petrosian
    7.Reshevsky
    8.Spassky
    9.Steinitz
    10.Tal

    As you can see,no Alekhine.Fischer may be mad but I'm pretty sure he has some knowledge of chess history.
    Fisher is not in the list either (and I didn't think he was a shy person) 😉
  8. Standard memberchessisvanity
    THE BISHOP GOD
    Account suspended
    Joined
    24 Jan '07
    Moves
    58368
    24 Nov '07 02:54
    I'm the World Champion.
  9. Joined
    15 Jun '06
    Moves
    16334
    24 Nov '07 08:241 edit
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    I really don't care what Kramnik agreed to (under threat of having his FIDE title, not the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP stripped). FIDE can't dictate who is World Champion; that is decided by match play.

    EDIT: Riddle me this; who was the World Champion during the 1990's?
    there were two. PCA world champ Kasparov and fide world champ Karpov.
  10. Joined
    13 Apr '06
    Moves
    2683
    14 Nov '08 18:03
    Originally posted by z00t
    Anand won just as Kasparov had predicted before the start of the event. I have been critical of Anand in the past but his play of late is at a high level. FIDE's rules mean he has to face off Kramnik in a match next year.
    I used to be very critical of Anand because from the Soviet School perspective you cannot have champs playing only 1. e4. He changed that in his match with Kramnik by playing 1. d4 Kudos to Anand for becoming a true chess player.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree