Originally posted by chesskid001It filled up in 24 hours... Check the forums every time you come on here. But it might not be for a while, this one is taking it's time.
Man, I wish I had joined!Didn't see this thread till you bumped it! Oh well, whenever you have the next one, I'll join. Seems neat.
Originally posted by Wayne1324In tennis (the only other game that I've ever been in a tournament), they actually pair the highest rated player against the lowest rated player, with two separate divisions (if you can still follow me). Basically, what this does is ensure a final between two highly skilled players, rather than a low rated player who really sucks just getting in there because of lucky pairings. That also ensures that #1 and 2 cannot play each other until the finals.
I was just gonna pair by ratings... I dont know anything about the round robin or swiss stuff.
Obviously, there are other ways to do it. But I personally like that style.
Originally posted by ih8senshmmm, but #2 always stinks
In tennis (the only other game that I've ever been in a tournament), they actually pair the highest rated player against the lowest rated player, with two separate divisions (if you can still follow me). Basically, what this does is ensure a final between two highly skilled players, rather than a low rated player who really sucks just getting in there becau ...[text shortened]... til the finals.
Obviously, there are other ways to do it. But I personally like that style.