Only Chess Forum
Auschwitz
- Joined
- 03 Apr '06
- Moves
- 44348
- Joined
- 26 Jun '06
- Moves
- 59283
Southern California
- Joined
- 13 Sep '06
- Moves
- 1841
2. d4
with a Danish Gambit to follow?
- Joined
- 24 Jan '08
- Moves
- 1805
Originally posted by irontigran
f4
we had a King's Gambit last time... lets get a bit of variety going here...
127.0.0.1
- Joined
- 27 Oct '05
- Moves
- 158564
2. Nf3 lets go with the classic continuation.
Not in lecture
- Joined
- 14 Mar '07
- Moves
- 5133
I agree with zebano 2. Nf3, but I'm hoping to see a studied Traxler game 😛
- Joined
- 15 Jun '06
- Moves
- 16334
Woodshed
- Joined
- 16 Apr '07
- Moves
- 35523
About
- Joined
- 11 Dec '04
- Moves
- 70350
Originally posted by jockmcgee
I agree with zebano 2. Nf3, but I'm hoping to see a studied Traxler game 😛
Me too since I'm still in a Traxler tourney here.
- Joined
- 28 Jan '08
- Moves
- 339
2. Bc4?!
A dubious move but still not refuted for obvious reasons. it would add variety.
Auschwitz
- Joined
- 03 Apr '06
- Moves
- 44348
Not in lecture
- Joined
- 14 Mar '07
- Moves
- 5133
Southern California
- Joined
- 13 Sep '06
- Moves
- 1841
Woodshed
- Joined
- 16 Apr '07
- Moves
- 35523
White is suggesting a Vienna, and the break with f4. Nf6 good. d6 still OK. f5 madness of the fun sort. Bc5?
- Joined
- 12 Mar '03
- Moves
- 44411
2. ... Nc6 hasn't been mentioned yet.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree